Ketamine for substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Shu-Ping Fang, Xin Yang, Da-Cong Zhao, Wen Yang, Ying Liu, Zhe Li, Mao-Sheng Ran
Frontiers in Psychiatry July 17, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1835709 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials with 798 participants found that ketamine treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) significantly improved abstinence rates in the short term (less than one month), but not at one to six months. Dropout rates and adverse events did not differ significantly between ketamine and control groups, though the available evidence was too limited to establish safety conclusively. The authors conclude that current evidence suggests a short-term efficacy signal for ketamine in SUD, but remains insufficient to establish its efficacy and safety definitively.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 798 |
| Population | Participants with substance use disorder (SUD) |
| Intervention | Ketamine |
| Topics | Ketamine |
| Keywords | Abstinence Adverse effect Randomized controlled trial Clinical trial |
| Key finding | Ketamine significantly improved short-term abstinence (less than one month) but not longer-term abstinence (one to six months) in substance use disorder. |
Abstract
Introduction Substance use disorder (SUD) is a major global health issue, contributing significantly to the disease burden. Despite this, effective treatments for SUD remain limited. Ketamine has shown potential as a treatment, yet no meta-analysis has assessed its efficacy for SUD. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ketamine in treating SUD. Methods Multiple databases were systematically searched forrandomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ketamine for SUD treatment. The primary outcome was abstinence rates. Adverse events and dropout rates were also assessed to evaluate safety and acceptability. A random-effects model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results Fifteen RCTs with 798 participants were included; seven RCTs contributed abstinence data to the quantitative synthesis. Ketamine was associated with significantly improved abstinence at <1 month [odds ratio(OR) = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.55–6.92, I 2 = 0%, p < 0.01], but not at 1–6 months (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 0.91–3.30, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.09). No significant difference in dropout rates was observed between the ketamine and control groups (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.46–1.21, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.23). No significant between group difference was identified in adverse events, although the available evidence was limited and insufficient to establish safety conclusively. Discussion Current evidence suggests a short-term efficacy signal for ketamine in SUD, but the evidence remains limited and insufficient to establish its efficacy and safety conclusively. Systematic review registration identifier CRD42024607116.