Mind and material engagement.
Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences January 1, 2019 DOI: 10.1007/s11097-018-9606-7 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMaterial Engagement Theory (MET) is a framework in cognitive archaeology and anthropology that argues mind and matter are fundamentally intertwined. The theory proposes that human cognition is shaped through active engagement with material things, a process called thinging, and that the brain is metaplastic, meaning it is continuously reconfigured by cultural practices and tools. Using pottery making as an example, the author shows how MET can guide empirical research and complement phenomenology and embodied cognitive science by revealing how making and handling objects transforms thought and experience.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Cognitive archaeology Enactivism Material engagement theory Metaplasticity Pottery making |
| Citations | 168 |
| Key finding | Material Engagement Theory posits that human cognition is constituted through dynamic interaction with material things, a process called thinging, and that the brain's metaplasticity allows cultural practices like pottery making to reshape thought and experience. |
Abstract
Material Engagement Theory (MET), which forms the focus of this special issue, is a relatively new development within cognitive archaeology and anthropology, but one that has important implications for many adjacent fields of research in phenomenology and the cognitive sciences. In How Things Shape the Mind (2013) I offered a detail exposition of the major working hypotheses and the vision of mind that it embodies. Here, introducing this special issue, more than just presenting a broad overview of MET, I seek to enrich and extend that vision and discuss its application to the study of mind and matter. I begin by laying out the philosophical roots, theoretical context and intellectual kinship of MET. Then I offer a basic outline of this theoretical framework focusing on the notions of thinging and metaplasticity. In the last part I am using the example of pottery making to illustrate how MET can be used to inform empirical research and how it might complement new research in phenomenology and embodied cognitive science.