Skip to content

Living the Five Domains: Phenomenal Co-Presence, Cognitive Embeddedness, and the Limits of Description

David (daoud) Matta

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) April 13, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19556146 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A philosophical inquiry into five domains of how being and the world are disclosed—persons, things and artifacts, nature, the self, and the encompassing whole—argues that these domains are typically co-present and mutually conditioning in lived experience. The argument draws on enactivism, embodied cognition, predictive processing, and social neuroscience to show that the five domains correspond to real cognitive structures. Pushing phenomenological and cognitive description to their limits, it uses Varela's neurophenomenology and Bitbol's philosophy of quantum mechanics to argue that perspectival situatedness remains ineliminable even in fundamental physics. The five-domain framework is presented as a living map of experience that becomes most useful where it exceeds itself.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Embodied cognition Phenomenology philosophy Consciousness Movement music Argument complex analysis
Key finding The five domains of disclosure are co-present and mutually conditioning in lived experience, correspond to real cognitive structures, and perspectival situatedness remains ineliminable even at the level of fundamental physics.

Abstract

This paper develops the final movement of a seven-paper philosophical inquiry into the disclosure of being and the world. Where the preceding papers examined the five domains—persons, things and artifacts, nature, the self, and the encompassing whole—as distinct yet related structures of disclosure, the present paper asks how they operate together in lived experience and what happens when their descriptions are pressed toward their limits. The argument unfolds in three movements that deepen into one another. The first movement shows that the five domains are typically co-present and mutually conditioning in lived experience, and that any moment of experience can be analyzed in terms of all five even when not all are equally salient. The second movement shows that this co-presence is not only phenomenologically describable but cognitively grounded, drawing on enactivism, embodied cognition, predictive processing, and the social neuroscience of recognition to show that the five domains correspond to real structures in how embodied minds inhabit and navigate reality. The third movement pushes both phenomenological and cognitive description to their outermost edge, drawing on Varela’s neurophenomenological methodology to ground the use of contemplative data, and on Bitbol’s phenomenological philosophy of quantum mechanics to show that perspectival situatedness remains ineliminable even at the level of fundamental physics—while carefully distinguishing this from the stronger claim that consciousness is required by quantum description. The paper concludes that the five-domain framework is neither a static taxonomy nor a speculative system, but a living map of experience that becomes most useful precisely where it begins to exceed itself.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment