Mystical Experience Among Tibetan Buddhists: The Common Core Thesis Revisited

A debate in mysticism asks whether a universal core experience exists across religions. This investigation combines Jamesian and social constructivist views, arguing that stable experiential facets combine differently across cultures to form local interpretations, which still share a family resemblance—a mystical common core. Confirmatory factor analyses of data from 240 Tibetan Buddhist adults show that a three-factor model fits better than a unidimensional model, indicating that pure experience can be distinguished from its context-specific interpretation.

Study at a glance

Abstract

In the study of mysticism the debate has centered on whether a universal experiential core exists regardless of religious interpretation. The current investigation combines Jamesian empiricist and social constructivist perspectives to argue that stable experiential facets load variously on factors to construct local interpretations. Local interpretations reflect a family resemblance—a mystical common core experienced across cultures. Results of confirmatory factor analyses, based on data from 240 Tibetan Buddhist adults, suggest statistical model fit and superiority for the three-factor model compared to the unidimensional model. Pure experience can be distinguished explicitly from its context-specific hermeneutical construal.