Skip to content

Genetic toxicology of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD-25)

Maimon M. Cohen, Yosef Shiloh

Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology January 1, 1977 DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(77)90003-3 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

After nearly 40 years of study, the genetic toxicology of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) remains inconclusive. In vitro studies suggest LSD either suppresses mitosis or enhances chromosome damage, but these findings do not translate clearly to living organisms. Controlled studies of pure LSD in humans indicate a possible transient increase in lymphocyte chromosome breakage, while animal cytogenetic results are contradictory. LSD is at best a weak mutagen, if mutagenic at all. It is not teratogenic in humans. Three reported leukemia cases among LSD users are likely coincidental, and no clear conclusions about clastogenicity, mutagenicity, teratogenicity, or oncogenicity can be drawn from the available data.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Topics LSD
Keywords Toxicology Clastogen Biology Hallucinogen
Citations 28
Key finding Based on available data, no clear conclusions can be drawn about LSD's clastogenicity, mutagenicity, teratogenicity, or oncogenicity, though it is not teratogenic in humans and is at best a weak mutagen.

Abstract

The acute and the chronic psychotomimetic potentials of the hallucinogen lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD-25) have been recognized for almost 40 years. That additional types of the biological effects should have come under scrutiny was directly attributable to widespread use and abuse of this drug on a world-wide basis. Although "genetic toxicology" encompasses a broad spectrum of disciplines, including many areas of highly specialized research, perhaps the most germane, and those on which this review has concentrated, are Clastogenicity, Mutagenicity, Teratogenicity and Oncogenicity. Based on our current understanding and interpretation of the available data, the genetic toxicology of LSD provides an excellent example of Newton's "third law of motion", e.g., to every force there is an equal and opposite reaction force. From the published material it is impossible to draw clear cut conclusions regarding any of the above "problem areas" in spite of the considerable scientific effort invested. Most of the in vitro studies performed on the clastogenicity of LSD indicate either suppression of mitosis or enhanced chromosome damage. However, extrapolation of such results to the in vivo situation is very difficult. With regard to in vivo human use of the drug, no concensus is attainable as to chromosome breakage and the inconsistencies within and between studies remain inexplicable. However, several of the "controlled" investigations assessing the in vivo effect of chemically pure LSD suggest a transient increase in lymphocyte chromosome breakage. On the other hand, the results of cytogenetic studies on experimental animals are contradictory. Although human studies are nonexistent, in those experimental organisms tested, using accepted techniques, LSD proved to be, at best, a weak mutagen, if mutagenic at all. Teratogenicity studies in animals are confusing due to the multitude of organisms and plethora of discriminant parameters studied. However, with regard to man there has been ample opportunity and one can conclude that LSD is not teratogenic. As to the drug's oncogenic potential, the 3 reported cases of leukemia in LSD users are most likely the result of coincidence.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment