Psychosis or spiritual emergency? A Foucauldian discourse analysis of case reports of extreme mental states in the context of meditation.
Justina Kaselionyte, Andrew Gumley
Transcultural psychiatry October 1, 2019 DOI: 10.1177/1363461519861842 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractExtreme mental states during meditation are framed in two contrasting ways in scientific case reports: as psychiatric symptoms or as spiritual emergencies. A discourse analysis of 22 case studies reveals a divide between biomedical and alternative framings, each offering distinct therapeutic approaches. Some authors blended both perspectives. The findings encourage collaboration between clinicians, therapists, and spiritual teachers to provide a range of supportive options for those experiencing such states.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Discourse analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 22 |
| Population | Case studies of meditation practitioners experiencing extreme mental states |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Discourse Psychosis Spiritual emergency Transpersonal psychology |
| Citations | 6 |
| Key finding | Extreme mental states in meditation are framed either as psychiatric symptoms or spiritual emergencies, with some authors blending both discourses. |
Abstract
Meditation is becoming increasingly popular in the West and research on its effects is growing. While studies point to various benefits of meditation on mental and physical health, reports of extreme mental states in the context of meditation have also been published. This study employed Foucauldian discourse analysis to examine how the experience of extreme mental states has been constructed in case reports and what kind of practices were employed to address them. The study analyses how extreme mental states associated with meditation are framed within the scientific literature and how such differential framings may affect the meaning making and help-seeking of persons experiencing these states. A systematic scientific literature search identified 22 case studies of extreme mental states experienced by practitioners of various types of meditation. The analysis suggests a discursive divide between two dominant framings: a biomedical discourse which constructs such experiences as psychiatric symptoms and an alternative discursive, which understands them as spiritual emergencies. Both approaches offered distinct therapeutic avenues. This divide maps onto the disciplinary divides within the mental health field more generally, which may obscure a better understanding of these experiences. However, the two discourses are not necessarily mutually exclusive and authors of three articles chose to blend them for their case reports. A supportive environment could help those experiencing extreme state integrate them into their lives. Our findings encourage collaboration between clinicians, therapists and spiritual teachers in order to make a range of approaches available.