Skip to content

Asian Studies

3 papers in the library · 20 citations · publishing 2016-2023

Papers

Confucius’ Embodied Knowledge

Asian Studies January 18, 2023 Margus Ott 14 citations

The Analects, a foundational text of Chinese philosophy, contains themes that align closely with modern embodiment theory (ET), including embodiment, embeddedness, enactment, extendedness, emotivity, implicitness, emergence, joy, and apprenticeship or self-cultivation. While recent Sinological research has addressed embodiment, explicit connections to ET have been rare. The article argues that ET offers a useful framework for interpreting key themes in the Analects, and conversely, that engaging with the Chinese philosophical tradition—which has discussed embodiment for over two millennia—could enrich ET's further development.

The Significance of “mushin”: The Essential Mind of Zen Buddhist Philosophy for Humans in a Contemporary World

Asian Studies February 29, 2016 Hisaki Hashi 6 citations

In an era dominated by digital networks and constant information flow, people often engage with technology physically but without mindful awareness. This has led to a neglect of human creativity, original thinking, and the transmission of ideas necessary for innovation. The Zen Buddhist philosophy of mind offers a dynamic approach to re-creating and reconstructing human life through the concept of "mu" (無), or absolute nothingness, and "mu-shin" (無心), the mind of mu. This philosophy presents a flexible, unified activity that counters the passive consumption of digital media by reawakening creative and mindful engagement.

Buddhism and Cognitive (Neuro)Science: An Uneasy Liaison?

Asian Studies January 18, 2023 Sebastjan Vörös

The article examines the relationship between Buddhism and science, focusing on consciousness research in cognitive neuroscience. It outlines three stances: rejection (incompatibility), acceptance (shared commonalities), and construction (compatibility achieved through historical processes). Which stance one adopts depends on how Buddhism and science are construed. The discussion narrows to consciousness research, reviewing arguments for and against collaboration between Buddhism and cognitive neuroscience, termed the 'Three Turnings of the Wheel of (Non)Interaction.' The analysis concludes with reflections on presuppositions and entailments of different stances, emphasizing the distinction between viewing Buddhism as a 'living' versus 'dead' tradition.