Skip to content

Matteo Marcatili

5 papers in the library · 158 citations · publishing 2023-2026

Papers

Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression

Bipolar Disorders January 13, 2023 Giovanni Martinotti, Bernardo Dell’osso, Giorgio Di Lorenzo et al. 72 citations

Esketamine nasal spray reduced depressive symptoms in people with treatment-resistant bipolar depression as effectively as in those with unipolar treatment-resistant depression, with no significant differences in response or remission rates after one and three months. The treatment also showed greater anxiety-reducing effects in the bipolar group. No treatment-emergent affective switch occurred, supporting the safety and tolerability of esketamine for bipolar treatment-resistant depression.

Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING)

Psychiatry Research July 29, 2023 Mauro Pettorruso, Roberto Guidotti, Giacomo D’andrea et al. 56 citations

Machine learning models predicted which patients with treatment-resistant depression would respond to esketamine nasal spray. In a retrospective study of 149 patients, three random forest classifiers achieved 68.53% accuracy for response at one month and 66.26% at three months, and 68.60% accuracy for remission at three months. Features such as severe anhedonia, anxious distress, mixed symptoms, and bipolarity positively predicted response and remission, while benzodiazepine use and depression severity were linked to delayed responses. The findings suggest machine learning may aid personalized treatment decisions for treatment-resistant depression.

Esketamine Treatment Trajectory of Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression in the Mid and Long-Term Run: Data from REAL-ESK Study Group.

Current neuropharmacology January 1, 2025 Gianluca Rosso, Giacomo d'Andrea, Stefano Barlati et al. 23 citations

Among patients with treatment-resistant depression who continued esketamine nasal spray for at least six months, 76.2% responded or achieved remission. Of those who had not responded by six months, a subset improved by twelve months. Side effects occurred in 71.8% of patients at six months, decreasing to 42% at twelve months; the most common were sedation and dissociation. Only two patients stopped treatment due to tolerability issues. The findings suggest esketamine is effective and safe for mid- to long-term treatment, with a novel observation of late clinical response in some patients. Results require confirmation in larger samples and longer observation periods.

Personalizing esketamine treatment in TRD and TRBD: the role of mentalization, cognitive rigidity, psychache, and suicidality.

Frontiers in psychiatry January 1, 2025 Miriam Olivola, Filippo Mazzoni, Barbara Tarantino et al. 7 citations

In treatment-resistant depression, esketamine—a glutamatergic modulator approved in 2019—may improve not only depressive symptoms but also key psychological factors such as mentalization, psychache, social cognition, suicidality, and cognitive-emotional rigidity. In a six-month observational study of 36 patients with treatment-resistant depressive episodes, depressive symptoms significantly decreased, as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. By six months, 69% of patients achieved remission, indicating a robust and sustained response. The findings suggest esketamine may be particularly beneficial in reducing cognitive rigidity and improving mentalization, potentially breaking the inflexible thinking patterns that sustain depression. Personalized treatment approaches are emphasized.

Pilot study on esketamine response in treatment-resistant depression: impact of pharmacogenetic, clinical, and demographic variables.

Frontiers in pharmacology January 1, 2026 Michaela Krivosova, Matteo Marcatili, Gessica Guerrera et al.

In a real-world group of 32 patients with treatment-resistant depression receiving intranasal esketamine over two months, no single demographic, clinical, or genetic variable—including BDNF (rs6265), OPRM1 (rs1799971) polymorphisms, or CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4 metabolizer status—reliably predicted treatment response. Adjunctive psychotherapy was the only factor significantly associated with remission. Most patients received the standard 84 mg dose, so nominal dosing explained little of the outcome variability. Exploratory analyses suggested that metabolic phenotype and concomitant pharmacotherapy may contribute to inter-individual differences. The findings support a multidimensional, clinically oriented approach to optimizing esketamine treatment rather than relying on a single predictor. The small sample size may have limited the ability to detect modest associations, so results are exploratory.