Antidepressant effects of a psychedelic experience in a large prospective naturalistic sample.
Victoria Amalie Nygart, Lis Marie Pommerencke, Eline Haijen, Hannes Kettner, Mendel Kaelen, Erik Lykke Mortensen, David John Nutt, Robin Lester Carhart-Harris, David Erritzøe
J Psychopharmacol August 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1177/02698811221101061 via PubMed Central
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractDepressive symptoms decreased two and four weeks after a psychedelic experience in a naturalistic, non-clinical setting. The study tracked a large group of people who planned to use psychedelics outside a lab or clinic, including only those with depressive symptoms at the start. A medicinal motive, prior psychedelic use, drug dose, and having an emotional breakthrough during the experience were all linked to greater symptom reductions. The authors note potential sample and attrition biases and call for further controlled and observational studies to confirm the findings.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort Longitudinal Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 302 |
| Population | Individuals with depressive symptoms planning a psychedelic experience in naturalistic settings |
| Intervention | Psychedelic experience |
| Duration | 4-week follow-up |
| Topics | Psychedelic-assisted therapy |
| Keywords | Depression treatment Mental well-being Clinical research Psychedelic experience |
| Citations | 73 |
| Key finding | Reductions in depressive symptoms were observed at 2 and 4 weeks after a naturalistic psychedelic experience, with medicinal motive, prior use, dose, and emotional breakthrough associated with improvement. |
Abstract
Background: Over the last two decades, a number of studies have highlighted the potential of psychedelic therapy. However, questions remain to what extend these results translate to naturalistic samples, and how contextual factors and the acute psychedelic experience relate to improvements in affective symptoms following psychedelic experiences outside labs/clinics. The present study sought to address this knowledge gap. Aim: Here, we aimed to investigate changes in anxiety and depression scores before versus after psychedelic experiences in naturalistic contexts, and how various pharmacological, extrapharmacological and experience factors related to outcomes. Method: Individuals who planned to undergo a psychedelic experience were enrolled in this online survey study. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks post-psychedelic experience, with self-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR-16) as the primary outcome. To facilitate clinical translation, only participants with depressive symptoms at baseline were included. Sample sizes for the four time points were N = 302, N = 182, N = 155 and N = 109, respectively. Results: Relative to baseline, reductions in depressive symptoms were observed at 2 and 4 weeks. A medicinal motive, previous psychedelic use, drug dose and the type of acute psychedelic experience (i.e. specifically, having an emotional breakthrough) were all significantly associated with changes in self-rated QIDS-SR-16. Conclusion: These results lend support to therapeutic potential of psychedelics and highlight the influence of pharmacological and non-pharmacological factors in determining response. Mindful of a potential sample and attrition bias, further controlled and observational longitudinal studies are needed to test the replicability of these findings.