Understanding Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy Providers' Perspective and Insights: A Qualitative Analysis.

Underground psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy providers described their protocols and perspectives in interviews analyzed through qualitative content analysis. Four themes emerged: personal experiences and self-healing motivated sharing and promoting positive effects of psychedelics as altruism; guides articulated consistent yet flexible processes; guides believed client benefit came from clients' own intrinsic ability to heal; and guides expressed dissonance about legalization, desiring increased access and decreased risk but also concerned about potential negative impacts on provider flexibility and depersonalization from standardization. The findings aim to inform research and policy as psychedelic use expands in the United States.

Study at a glance

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of psychedelics for therapeutic and recreational use. Research has been hindered by federal prohibition, put in place in 1970. Despite the regulatory difficulty, research has rapidly expanded in the past decade. Multiple states and cities have drafted their own policies regarding the use of psychedelics. Assuming interest in psychedelics continues to expand; every opportunity should be explored to better understand how psychedelics may be helping or harming people. This study examined underground psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy providers' protocols and perspectives, to better inform policy and public health, as psychedelics increasingly are used in the United States. Transcripts of interviews were examined through qualitative content analysis. The following four themes were identified: (1) personal experiences and self-healing motivated sharing and promotion of the positive effects of psychedelics as an expression of altruism, (2) guides articulated consistent, yet flexible processes, (3) guides believed that the client benefit was actualized through their own intrinsic ability to heal themselves, and (4) guides expressed an overwhelming sense of dissonance regarding psychedelic legalization, not only desiring increased access and decreased risk but also expressing concern about potential negative impacts on provider flexibility, and depersonalization that could come with standardizing this field of practice. In order for current research and policy to be best informed, information must be gathered from both clinical trials and observational studies of current practice. This study identified themes within the latter to provide perspectives, practices, and insights of current underground practice, so it can be used to inform research and policy moving forward.