Skip to content

Effects of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Xiao-Mei Li, Zhan-Ming Shi, Hua Hu, Pei-Jia Wang

General Psychiatry June 18, 2020 DOI: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100117 via DOAJ

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials (239 participants) compared ketamine alone or ketamine plus propofol against propofol alone in patients with major depressive disorder receiving a single electroconvulsive therapy session. Ketamine alone and the combination showed greater improvement in depressive symptoms at days 1, 3, and 7 after treatment, and were associated with longer seizure duration and higher seizure energy index. Ketamine alone also increased eye-opening time. However, the overall quality of evidence was very low or low, indicating a need for higher-quality trials.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 239
Population Patients with major depressive disorder undergoing a single electroconvulsive therapy session
Interventions Ketamine alone Ketamine plus propofol
Duration Single ECT session, with follow-up at days 1, 3, and 7
Keywords Ect Ketamine anesthesia: ketamine Anesthetic Ketamine-based anesthesia Rapid relief
Citations 13
Key finding Ketamine alone and ketamine plus propofol appeared to rapidly improve depressive symptoms compared with propofol alone in patients with major depressive disorder receiving a single ECT session, but the evidence level was very low or low.

Abstract

Background The use of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been examined in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis of related randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Aim To examine the efficacy and safety of ketamine augmentation of ECT in MDD treatment.Methods Two reviewers searched Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang) and English (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane Library) databases from their inception to 23 July 2019. The included studies' bias risk was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was improved depressive symptoms at day 1 after a single ECT treatment session. Data were pooled to calculate the standardised mean difference and risk ratio with their 95% CIs using RevMan V.5.3. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the whole quality of evidence.Results Four RCTs (n = 239) compared ketamine alone or ketamine plus propofol (n = 149) versus propofol alone (n = 90) in patients with MDD who underwent a single ECT session. Three RCTs were considered as unclear risk with respect to random sequence generation using the Cochrane risk of bias. Compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol had greater efficacy in the treatment of depressive symptoms at days 1, 3 and 7 after a single ECT session. Moreover, compared with propofol alone, ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol were significantly associated with increased seizure duration and seizure energy index. Compared with propofol, ketamine alone was significantly associated with increased opening-eye time. Based on the GRADE approach, the evidence level of primary and secondary outcomes ranged from very low (26.7%, 4/15) to ‘low’ (73.3%, 11/15).Conclusion Compared with propofol, there were very low or low evidence levels showing that ketamine alone and the combination of ketamine and propofol appeared to rapidly improve depressive symptoms of patients with MDD undergoing a single ECT session. There is a need for high-quality RCTs.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment