Skip to content

Loops All the Way Up: Recurrency as an Implementation-first Primitive for Consciousness

PsyArXiv May 29, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/wqnzc_v2

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Consciousness science is fragmented, with theories operating in isolation and accumulating anomalies. The principle of recurrency—functional and architectural feedback loops—offers a unifying, mechanistic scaffold. All theories of consciousness tacitly invoke feedback loops and can be re-expressed along a single axis of recursion. Four nested levels (cellular, local inter-areal, global, and lateral) map onto state, phenomenal content, manipulative access, and experiential similarity, tying evolved anatomy to phenomenon. The traditional phenomenal-versus-access distinction dissolves into a graded cascade where deeper recursion expands reportable variables. Recurrence is evolutionarily and ontologically favored, rebutting feed-forward objections. Brain-body and environment loops ground selfhood. Clinically, targeting recurrent pathways may yield new biomarkers and treatments for disorders of consciousness.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Key finding All theories of consciousness tacitly invoke feedback loops and can be unified along a single axis of recursion, with four nested levels mapping onto different aspects of consciousness.

Abstract

Consciousness science is fragmented, and empirical investigations are confined within each theory of consciousness’ (TOC) framework. Proliferating ToCs accumulate anomalies without progress, operating orthogonally. The principle of recurrency – functional and architectural – offers a unifying, mechanistic scaffold for consciousness to arise. We show that all theories tacitly invoke feedback loops and can be re-expressed along a single axis of recursion. Four nested levels, viz., cellular, local inter-areal, global, and lateral, map onto state, phenomenal content, manipulative access, and experiential similarity, respectively, thus tying evolved anatomy to phenomenon. The traditional phenomenal-versus-access stand-off dissolves into a graded cascade wherein deeper recursion expands the set of reportable, behaviour-driving variables. Recurrence is favoured evolutionarily, and ontologically, rebutting feed-forward, “unfolding” objections, while brain-body loops ground selfhood, and complete action loops with the environment. Furthermore, clinically, targeting recurrent pathways promise new biomarkers, and alleviation, in disorders of consciousness (DoCs). The field urgently requires this conceptual unification that is biologically plausible, mechanistic, and empirically testable.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment