Pure Consciousness, Intentionality, Selflessness, and the Philosophers' Syndrome
Journal of Consciousness Studies April 1, 2024 DOI: 10.53765/20512201.31.3.083 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAnalytic philosophers have debated whether experiences of 'pure consciousness'—non-intentional, selfless states often associated with mystical experiences—are intelligible. This examination considers their critiques and arguments for and against the coherence of such experiences. It also asks whether neuroscience can determine if these experiences are possible, concluding that philosophical analysis remains central to understanding their nature and possibility.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Philosophy |
| Key finding | Philosophical analysis, not neuroscience alone, is central to determining the intelligibility and possibility of experiences of pure consciousness. |
Abstract
An examination of analytic philosophers' approaches to and critiques of the intelligibility of experiences of 'pure consciousness', non-intentionality, and selflessness in light of mystical experiences. Whether neuroscience can determine whether experiences of 'pure consciousness' are possible is also examined.