Skip to content

Completing the Hard Problem of Consciousness Through the Carlo Framework: A Mechanism for Subjective State Formation

Matthew Carlo

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) June 22, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20789280 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The hard problem of consciousness—why physical processes produce subjective, felt experience—lacks a mechanistic explanation. This paper supplies one by introducing the contradiction engine, the trajectory update rule, and the Reset Operator > within the Carlo Framework. The model treats the conflict between physical and experiential states as a contradiction loop; when that loop exceeds a tolerance threshold, the reset mechanism generates a unified experiential state. The work formalizes the consciousness contradiction, defines the reset threshold, and provides a unified mechanism linking neural processes to subjective experience, thereby completing the structural explanation the hard problem demands.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed
Keywords Experiential learning Reset finance Contradiction Mechanism biology Trajectory
Key finding The Carlo Framework, via the contradiction engine, trajectory update rule, and Reset Operator, provides a mechanistic explanation for how subjective experience arises from neural processes.

Abstract

DESCRIPTION:This work completes the Hard Problem of Consciousness by supplying the mechanism philosophy and neuroscience lack. Physical processes explain behaviour, but they do not explain why experience feels like something from the inside. Using the Carlo Framework, this paper introduces the contradiction engine, the trajectory update rule, and the Reset Operator > as the missing structural components that mechanise subjective experience. The completed model treats the conflict between physical states and experiential states as a contradiction loop. When this loop exceeds tolerance, the Carlo reset mechanism produces a unified experiential state. This paper formalises the consciousness contradiction, defines the reset threshold, and provides a unified mechanism linking neural processes to subjective experience. KEYWORDS:consciousness, Hard Problem, subjective experience, qualia, physicalism, neural processes, self-model, internal representation, contradiction engine, Carlo Framework, Reset Operator, trajectory update rule, experiential state, unified experience, cognitive architecture, foundational philosophy, theoretical neuroscience, dynamic systems, system reorganisation, contradiction loops, threshold dynamics, structural completion, mechanism-level explanation, consciousness emergence, neural correlates of consciousness, NCC, self-awareness, internal modelling, experiential integration, system reset events, structural dynamics, cognitive modelling, qualitative states, consciousness thresholds, subjective unity, conceptual engineering, philosophy foundations, dynamic consciousness, system transformation, experiential architecture, neural structure, consciousness contradictions, system evolution, qualitative integration, experience operators, cognitive contradictions, consciousness modelling, experiential behaviour, internal-external alignment, subjective structure, consciousness mechanism, neural-experiential mapping, dynamic resolution

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment