Anaesthetics and time perception: A review.
Jordan J Wehrman, Clara C Chung, Robert Sanders
Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) September 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1177/17470218221144614 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAnaesthetic drugs alter the subjective experience of time. Ketamine makes time feel slower, while GABAergic drugs make time feel faster. For very short intervals, time perception becomes more variable but does not consistently shift. When timing longer durations, people tend to estimate them as longer than they actually are. Motor timing tasks also become more variable under anaesthetic agents. The review of 36 articles highlights the need for more systematic research on how anaesthesia affects time perception and whether unconscious events can still be timed.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 36 |
| Keywords | Time perception Anaesthetic drugs Consciousness in time Interval timing Pharmacology manipulation |
| Key finding | Ketamine slows subjective time while GABAergic drugs speed it up; short-interval timing becomes more variable, and longer durations are overestimated. |
Abstract
Consciousness requires subjective experience in the "now." Establishing "now," however, necessitates temporal processing. In the current article, we review one method of altering consciousness, anaesthetic drug administration, and its effects on perceived duration. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and ScienceDirect databases, and article reference sections, for combinations of anaesthetic drugs and time perception tasks, finding a total of 36 articles which met our inclusion criteria. We categorised these articles with regard to whether they altered the felt passage of time, short or long interval timing, or were motor timing tasks. We found that various drugs alter the perceived passage of time; ketamine makes time subjectively slow down while GABAergic drugs make time subjectively speed up. At a short interval there is little established evidence of a shift in time perception, though temporal estimates appear more variable. Similarly, when asked to use time to optimise responses (i.e., in motor timing tasks), various anaesthetic agents make timing more variable. Longer durations are estimated as lasting longer than their objective duration, though there is some variation across articles in this regard. We conclude by proposing further experiments to examine time perception under altered states of consciousness and ask whether it is possible to perceive the passage of time of events which do not necessarily reach the level of conscious perception. The variety of methods used raises the need for more systematic investigations of time perception under anaesthesia. We encourage future investigations into the overlap of consciousness and time perception to advance both fields.