Liangkang Ni on Husserl and Buddhism: a comparative phenomenological analysis.
Frontiers in psychology January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1655534 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractLiangkang Ni's work identifies deep parallels and divergences between Edmund Husserl's phenomenology and Yogācāra Buddhism, particularly in doctrines like consciousness-only, store-consciousness, and self-consciousness. Ni reads Husserl's own reflections on Buddhism and reconstructs genetic and structural parallels between Husserl's genetic phenomenology and Yogācāra concepts. The article provides conceptual clarification and theoretical integration aimed at informing contemporary debates in consciousness studies, rather than offering new empirical data.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Buddhism Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Edmund husserl Liangkang ni Yogācāra Consciousness research |
| Key finding | Liangkang Ni's work reveals significant parallels and divergences between Husserl's genetic phenomenology and Yogācāra Buddhist doctrines such as consciousness-only, store-consciousness, and self-consciousness. |
Abstract
Over several decades, Liangkang Ni has developed a distinctive perspective on the parallels and divergences between Edmund Husserl's phenomenology and Buddhism, particularly Yogācāra Buddhism. Despite the significance of his contributions, Ni's writings remain largely unavailable in English and have thus had limited exposure in Western phenomenological discourse. This article addresses that gap by offering a thematic reconstruction of Ni's key insights. The first part examines Ni's reading of Husserl's own philosophical reflections on Buddhism in relation to phenomenology. The second part explores Ni's reconstruction of genetic and structural parallels between Husserl's genetic phenomenology and Yogācāra doctrines such as vijñaptimātra (consciousness-only), ālaya-vijñāna, and manas. The article assumes some familiarity with Husserl and uses his framework as an entry point to introduce Buddhist concepts. Rather than offering new empirical data, the article provides conceptual clarification and theoretical integration aimed at informing contemporary debates in consciousness studies.