Dose-response study of propofol combined with two different doses of esketamine for laryngeal mask airway insertion in women undergoing hysteroscopy.
Yan-Jun Lin, Su-Li Chen, Xiang-Li Zheng, Shuang Yu, Liang-Yuan Lu
Heliyon May 15, 2024 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30511 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractIn female patients undergoing hysteroscopy, combining propofol with 0.2 mg/kg of esketamine required a median effective dose (ED50) of 1.95 mg/kg of propofol to prevent response to laryngeal mask airway insertion, while 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine lowered the ED50 to 1.60 mg/kg. The 95% effective doses were 2.22 mg/kg and 2.15 mg/kg, respectively. Although the higher esketamine dose reduced propofol needs, it led to significantly greater additional propofol doses and higher airway pressure. No serious adverse effects occurred. The authors recommend using 0.2 mg/kg esketamine with propofol for optimal conditions during LMA insertion in this population.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 58 |
| Population | Female patients aged 20-60 years, ASA I-II, scheduled for elective hysteroscopy |
| Interventions | Esketamine Propofol |
| Dose | 0.2 mg/kg esketamine; 0.3 mg/kg esketamine; propofol initial dose 2 mg/kg |
| Topics | Esketamine Ketamine |
| Keywords | Dose-response relationship Laryngeal mask airway Median effective dose Anesthesia |
| Citations | 7 |
| Key finding | Propofol combined with 0.2 mg/kg esketamine provides optimal conditions for LMA insertion in women undergoing hysteroscopy, with an ED50 of 1.95 mg/kg and fewer adverse effects compared to 0.3 mg/kg esketamine. |
Abstract
To prospectively determine the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol for inhibiting a response to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion when combined with different doses of esketamine in female patients. A total of 58 female patients (aged 20-60 years, ASAⅠ-Ⅱ) scheduled for elective hysteroscopy were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups, one of which was administered 0.2 mg/kg of esketamine (K1 group, n = 28) and the other 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine (K2 group, n = 30). The 2 groups received the corresponding doses of esketamine intravenously, followed by an intravenous injection of propofol (injection time was 30 s). The initial dose of propofol was 2 mg/kg, and the dose ratio of propofol in the adjacent patients was 0.9. If a positive reaction occurred due to LMA insertion, the dose ratio in the next patient was increased by 1 gradient; if not, the dose ratio was decreased by 1 gradient. The ED50, 95 % effective dose (ED95) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) of propofol for inhibiting a response to LMA insertion in the 2 esketamine groups were calculated using probit analysis. The ED50 of propofol for inhibiting a response to LMA insertion in female patients was 1.95 mg/kg (95 % CI, 1.82-2.08 mg/kg) in the K1 group and 1.60 mg/kg (95 % CI, 1.18-1.83 mg/kg) in the K2 group. The ED95 of propofol for inhibiting a response to LMA insertion in female patients was 2.22 mg/kg (95 % CI, 2.09-2.86 mg/kg) in the K1 group and 2.15 mg/kg (95 % CI, 1.88-3.09 mg/kg) in the K2 group. Propofol combined with 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine has low ED50 and ED95 effective doses for inhibiting an LMA insertion response in female patients undergoing hysteroscopy and surgery. There were no significant adverse effects, but the additional dose of propofol and airway pressure were significantly higher than those in the group administered 0.2 mg/kg of esketamine. Based on the results, we recommend the combination of propofol with 0.2 mg/kg esketamine for optimal conditions during LMA insertion in women undergoing hysteroscopy.