Skip to content

A Critical Appreciation of Abū al-A‘lā al-Mawdūdī’s Reading of Sufism

Muhammad Maroof Shah

Teosofi Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam December 20, 2020 DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2020.10.2.226-252 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The negative image of Syed Abū al-A‘lā al-Mawdūdī as an opponent of Sufism persists partly because scholars engage only superficially with his doctrinal positions and read his statements in isolation. This paper argues that a more complete reading reveals Mawdūdī entered into a dialogue with Sufism, acknowledged his debt to it, and should be seen as a contributor to debates on Sufism rather than a simplistic denier. Evidence includes his moral mysticism, respect for Sufi masters, celebration of his Sufi ancestry, early Sufi-influenced poetry, engagement with Mulla Sadra's al-Asfār al-Arba‘a, and reworking of Sufi themes and organizational structures in the Jamaat-e-Islami.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Keywords Sufism Appropriation Reading process Key lock
Key finding Mawdūdī should be understood as a contributor to the debate on Sufism, not a simplistic denier, based on evidence of his dialogue with and appropriation of Sufi themes.

Abstract

There is a problem of persistence of anti-Sufi image of Syed Abū al-A‘lā al-Mawdūdī owing its genesis partly to tangential engagement with key doctrinal issues of Sufism and certain ambivalence regarding it in him and, more significantly, due to Mawdūdī’ scholarship’s atomistic reading of his key statements. For addressing this key problem, this paper critiques atomistic reading and explores certain background methodological issues and reflections on definitions of Sufism besides key points in his life and work. Our analysis of his work shows he entered into a dialogue with Sufism, acknowledged his debt to it, and we better approach him a contributor to the debate on Sufism and not its simplistic denier/outsider. Evidences include, among others, his moral mysticism, his respect for major Sufi Masters and celebration of his Sufi ancestry, his attempt to visit Sufi Masters, his early poetry in Sufi vein, his involvement with (and influence from) the al-Asfār al-Arba‘a of Mulla Sadra, and his reworking/appropriation of certain key Sufi themes and Sufi organizational structure in the Jamaat-e-Islami.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment