High-level Enactive and Embodied Cognition in Expert Sport Performance
K. Krein, Jesús Ilundáin-agurruza
Sport, Ethics, and Neurophilosophy June 15, 2017 DOI: 10.1080/17511321.2017.1334004 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractCognition arises through interactions between organisms and their environment, not through internal mental representations. Enactive and embodied theories explain high-level performances in sports, dance, and martial arts better than representational accounts. Flow and mushin—mindfully fluid awareness—are explained enactively. This analysis shows that enactivism offers theoretical and practical advantages for understanding high performance, while sports performance validates enactivism.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Psychology |
| Citations | 18 |
| Key finding | Enactive theories explain high-level cognition underlying best performances in sport and similar practices better than representational accounts. |
Abstract
Abstract Mental representation has long been central to standard accounts of action and cognition generally, and in the context of sport. We argue for an enactive and embodied account that rejects the idea that representation is necessary for cognition, and posit instead that cognition arises, or is enacted, in certain types of interactions between organisms and their environment. More specifically, we argue that enactive theories explain some kinds of high-level cognition, those that underlie some of the best performances in sport and similar practices (dance, martial arts), better than representational accounts. Flow and mushin (mindfully fluid awareness) are explained enactively to this end. This results in a mutually beneficial analysis where enactivism offers theoretical and practical advantages as an explanation of high performance in sports, while the latter validates enactivism.