Altered states of knowledge: the attainment of gnosis in the Hermetica
The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition January 1, 2008 DOI: 10.1163/187254708x335728 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe article examines how Hermetic writings describe a hierarchy of knowledge, where the highest understanding (gnōsis) is achieved only during ecstatic or altered states of consciousness that transcend rationality. Earlier scholarship dismissed these references as literary fictions, while more recent work takes them seriously as reflecting actual ritual practices. Through close reading of three core texts and challenging existing translations, the author argues that Hermetic teachings are not unsystematic or confused but contain a precise doctrine: initiates can move from rational discourse through several trans-rational stages to direct experiential knowledge, thereby progressing from the temporal material world to the eternal realm of Mind.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Philosophy Biology |
| Citations | 85 |
| Key finding | Hermetic writings contain a precise doctrine of a sequential hierarchy of knowledge levels, with the highest gnōsis attained only during ecstatic or altered states of consciousness that transcend rationality. |
Abstract
Research into the so-called "philosophical" Hermetica has long been dominated by the foundational scholarship of Andre-Jean Festugiere, who strongly emphasized their Greek and philosophical elements. Since the late 1970s, this perspective has given way to a new and more complex one, due to the work of another French scholar, Jean-Pierre Mahe, who could profit from the discovery of new textual sources, and called much more attention to the Egyptian and religious dimensions of the hermetic writings. This article addresses the question of how, on these foundations, we should evaluate and understand the frequent hermetic references to profound but wholly ineffable revelatory and salvational insights received during "ecstatic" states. Festugiere dismissed them as "literary fictions", whereas Mahe took them much more seriously as possibly reflecting ritual practices that took place in hermetic communities. Based upon close reading of three central texts (CH I, CH XIII, NH VI6), and challenging existing translations and interpretations, this article argues that the authors of the hermetic corpus assumed a sequential hierarchy of "levels of knowledge", in which the highest and most profound knowledge (gnōsis) is attained only during ecstatic or "altered" states of consciousness that transcend rationality. While the hermetic teachings have often been described as unsystematic, inconsistent, incoherent or confused, in fact they are grounded in a precise and carefully formulated doctrine of how the hermetic initiate may move from the domain of mere rational discourse to the attainment of several "trans-rational" stages of direct experiential knowledge, and thereby from the limited and temporal domain of material reality to the unlimited and eternal one of Mind.