Cosmism in Advaita Vedānta
Journal of Indian Knowledge Systems June 22, 2026 DOI: 10.1163/30510171-00201004 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAdvaita Vedānta is often seen as world-negating, but this paper argues it actually presents a cosmist, world-affirming vision. The world is neither denied nor absolutized but affirmed as contingently real and ethically significant. Using Jean-Paul Sartre's non-egological account of consciousness, the paper shows how the ego is displaced from the interior of experience and situated within the world. It traces doctrines of māyā and adhyāsa from Śaṅkara through post-Śaṅkara Advaita, explaining egohood as metaphysical misidentification rather than ontological falsity, preserving the empirical world as the locus of experience and action. Jīvanmukti is interpreted as embodied freedom within the world, not withdrawal.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Philosophy |
| Key finding | Advaita Vedānta articulates a fundamentally cosmist vision in which the world is affirmed as contingently real and ethically significant, and liberation is embodied freedom within the world. |
Abstract
Advaita Vedānta has frequently been interpreted as world-negating, giving rise to charges of metaphysical quietism and ethical disengagement. This paper argues, by contrast, that Advaita articulates a fundamentally cosmist vision in which the world is neither denied nor absolutized, but affirmed as contingently real and ethically significant. The argument proceeds through a threefold analysis of ego, world, and liberation. Drawing on Jean-Paul Sartre’s non-egological account of consciousness, the paper shows how the ego is displaced from the interior of experience and situated within the world, thereby unsettling ‘subject-centered’ conceptions of freedom. It then traces the development of the doctrines of māyā a nd adhyāsa , from Śaṅkara through post-Śaṅkara Advaita, showing that Advaita explains egohood as metaphysical misidentification rather than ontological falsity, while preserving the empirical world as the locus of experience and action. Finally, the paper interprets jīvanmukti not as withdrawal from the world, but as embodied freedom within it. In doing so, it shows that Advaita Vedānta offers a robust, world-affirming metaphysics in which cosmism emerges as its implicit philosophical horizon.