Skip to content

The quest for optimal ketamine dosing formula in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.

Julia Kwaśna, Wiesław Jerzy Cubała, Aleksander Kwaśny, Alina Wilkowska

Pharmacological reports : PR December 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1007/s43440-024-00637-x via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Intravenous ketamine at 0.5-1.0 mg/kg based on actual body weight is effective for treatment-resistant depression. In a retrospective analysis of 28 inpatients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, alternative dosing formulas using lean body mass, ideal body weight, or body surface area generally led to underdosing compared to the standard 0.5 mg/kg dose. Only two participants received higher doses when using the Devine formula. The findings suggest that alternative dosing methods may reduce treatment response and complicate outcome interpretation. Future studies should incorporate direct body composition measures like bioimpedance and waist-to-hip ratio.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Retrospective analysis of an open-label study Peer reviewed
Sample size 28
Population Inpatients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder
Intervention Intravenous ketamine
Dose 0.5-1.0 mg/kg based on actual body weight
Topics Depression Ketamine
Keywords Body surface area Dose calculation Ideal body weight Lean body mass
Citations 4
Key finding Alternative ketamine dosing formulas (using lean body mass, ideal body weight, or body surface area) generally resulted in underdosing compared to the standard 0.5 mg/kg dose based on actual body weight.

Abstract

Emerging evidence indicates that intravenous ketamine is effective in managing treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression. Clinical studies highlight its favorable efficacy, safety, and tolerability profile within a dosage range of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg based on actual body weight. However, data on alternative dosage calculation methods, particularly in relation to body mass index (BMI) and therapeutic outcomes, remain limited. This retrospective analysis of an open-label study aims to evaluate dose calculation strategies and their impact on treatment response among inpatients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 28). The study employed the Boer and Devine formulas to determine lean body mass (LBM) and ideal body weight (IBW), and the Mosteller formula to estimate body surface area (BSA). The calculated doses were then compared with the actual doses administered or converted to a dosage per square meter for both responders and non-responders. Regardless of treatment response, defined as a reduction of 50% in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, the use of alternative ketamine dosing formulas resulted in underdosing compared to the standardized dose of 0.5 mg/kg. Only two participants received higher doses (102.7% and 113.0%) when the Devine formula was applied. This study suggests that ketamine dosing formulas, alternative to the standardized 0.5 mg/kg based on body weight, may lead to underdosing and potentially impact outcome interpretation. To enhance dosing accuracy, future studies should consider incorporating body impedance analysis and waist-to-hip ratio measurements, as this study did not account for body composition.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment