Skip to content

Heidegger and Mindfulness Meditation: Making Peace With the Abyss

Erik Kuravsky

Journal of humanistic psychology November 4, 2023 DOI: 10.1177/00221678231198740 via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Mindfulness is often treated as a psychological tool for reducing stress or improving performance, but this essay argues that such a utilitarian view misses its deeper existential purpose. Drawing on Heidegger’s philosophy, the author contends that human suffering stems from an anxious rejection of nothingness, which forces beings to be experienced only as objects of attachment, creating a subject–object dualism and radical alienation from the world. This predicament cannot be resolved by using mindfulness as a technique to manage psychological resources, because liberation cannot be achieved through intention. Instead, Heidegger’s concepts of “letting-be,” “objectless waiting,” and “attention to Beyng” show how mindfulness meditation can open a nonintentional dimension of experience where genuine liberation from suffering may occur.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Philosophy
Citations 1
Key finding Mindfulness cannot overcome existential alienation if understood as a psychological technique, but Heidegger’s ideas of “letting-be” and “objectless waiting” reveal how meditation can access a nonintentional dimension where liberation may happen.

Abstract

In this article, an attempt is made to free mindfulness from its modern psychologically utilitarian interpretation and display its ontological-existential essence. To do that, the essay offers the existential roots of human suffering and the ontological meaning of attachment that is found at the basis of suffering. Heidegger’s philosophy is used to show that due to our anxious rejection of the nothingness that co-constitutes the Being of beings, we exist in a mode in which beings can only be experienced as objects of attachment. This ontological predicament is explicated in terms of radical alienation from the world, which takes the form of the subject–object dualism and founds what we normally take to be our psychological identity. The essay stresses that this predicament cannot be overcome by mindfulness as long as mindfulness is understood as a technique used to utilize one’s psychological resources. This impossibility is tightly related to the paradox that one cannot achieve liberation by intending to do so. Heidegger’s ideas of “letting-be,” “objectless waiting,” and “attention to Beyng” are then applied to show how mindfulness meditation can afford one to become acquainted with a nonintentional dimension of experience wherein liberation from suffering may occur.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment