Skip to content

Toward an Entheogen Research Agenda

T. B. Roberts, P. J. Hruby

Journal of Humanistic Psychology January 1, 2002 DOI: 10.1177/0022167802421004 via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The authors argue that a complete study of religion must include entheogens—psychedelic substances that can induce experiences of the divine. Drawing on William James, Charles Tart, and Ken Wilber, they propose a research agenda covering the spiritual nature of the human mind, the authenticity of entheogen-assisted religious experiences, pastoral counseling, experimental mysticism, entheogenic origins of religion, and policy issues around freedom of conscience and religion. They conclude with seven recommendations for churches, religious orders, seminaries, and scholarly groups to promote entheogenic research.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Sociology Psychology Philosophy
Citations 10
Key finding A complete study of religion must include entheogens, and the authors propose a research agenda and recommendations for promoting entheogenic research.

Abstract

The word entheogen was coined to denote psychedelic chemicals and botanicals that engender the experience of god within. Drawing on William James, Charles Tart, and Ken Wilber, the authors claim that a complete study of religion must include entheogens, and they propose topics leading toward an entheogen research agenda:(a) the spiritual nature of the human mind, (b) the dispute over the authenticity of entheogen-assisted religious experiences, (c) pastoral counseling, (d) experimental mysticism, (e) entheogenic origins of religion, and (f) policy issues in freedom of conscience and freedom of religion. The authors conclude with seven recommendations to churches, religious orders, seminaries, and scholarly and scientific professional groups for actions they can take to promote entheogenic research.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment