Skip to content

A comparative Study of Literary representations of Spiritual and Intellectual Mysticisms

Vikhyath S Shetty

International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences January 1, 2026 DOI: 10.22161/ijels.111.43 via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Mystical experiences are often considered ineffable, yet mystics have persistently tried to articulate them. This paper compares two modes of articulation—spiritual and intellectual—through a literary analysis of Ramana Maharshi and Jiddu Krishnamurti. Ramana Maharshi’s writings display pedagogical assurance, grounded in the authority of realization and aimed at guiding seekers. Krishnamurti’s accounts reflect an ongoing, self-reflexive inquiry, where language serves to understand the experience for himself rather than to instruct. The juxtaposition reveals similarities beneath their distinct approaches, showing how each negotiates the tension between ineffability and expression.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Comparative literary analysis Peer reviewed
Population Writings of Ramana Maharshi and Jiddu Krishnamurti
Keywords Philosophy
Key finding Despite different orientations—pedagogical assurance in Ramana Maharshi and self-reflexive inquiry in Krishnamurti—both figures reveal similarities beneath their distinct modes of articulating mystical experience.

Abstract

Mysticism is often understood as an altered state of consciousness associated primarily with religious traditions. In spite of characterizing their experiences as ineffable, mystics across traditions have persistently attempted to articulate such experiences, producing diverse textual and pedagogical forms. This paper examines two distinct modes of articulating mystical experience—spiritual and intellectual—through a comparative literary analysis of the accounts of Ramana Maharshi and Jiddu Krishnamurti. While both figures emerge from divergent spiritual trajectories, their writings reveal fundamentally different orientations toward experience and expression. Ramana Maharshi’s articulations are marked by pedagogical assurance, grounded in the authority of realization and directed toward guiding seekers. In contrast, Krishnamurti’s accounts reflect an ongoing, self-reflexive inquiry, where language functions less as instruction than as a means of understanding the experience for himself. Focusing on the selected texts of Ramana Maharshi and Jiddu Krishnamurthy the paper explores how each figure negotiates the tension between ineffability and expression. By Through the juxtaposition of these two distinct modes of articulation, the study aims to demonstrate the similarities beneath their experiences.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment