Skip to content

Skip the Trip? Five Arguments on the Use of Nonhallucinogenic Psychedelics in Psychiatry

Andrew Peterson, D. Sisti

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics October 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180122000081 via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The authors argue that the concept of personal identity is central to ethical debates about emerging neurotechnologies, such as deep brain stimulation and memory modification. They contend that these technologies can alter traits and memories in ways that raise concerns about continuity of self. The paper examines philosophical accounts of personal identity and applies them to clinical and research contexts, suggesting that ethical evaluation must consider how interventions affect a person's narrative identity. The authors conclude that a nuanced understanding of identity is necessary for responsible development and use of neurotechnologies.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Medicine Philosophy Psychology
Citations 11
Key finding Personal identity is a crucial ethical consideration for neurotechnologies that can alter traits and memories.

Abstract

Andrew Peterson* and Dominic Sisti Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy and Department of Philosophy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA Penn Program on Precision Medicine for the Brain, University of Pennsylvania Memory Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA *Corresponding author. Email: apeter31@gmu.edu

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment