The shifting fortunes of corporate psychedelia
Finance and Society September 8, 2025 DOI: 10.1017/fas.2025.10014 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA boom in for-profit psychedelic medicine from 2016 to late 2021 was followed by a bust continuing through late 2024. The cycle is explained by capitalization, where present valuations depend on investor expectations of future earnings. Psychedelic companies face intensified volatility due to the unruliness of these substances as capitalized assets: murky intellectual property, unpredictable subjective experiences, and cultural stigma. During the boom, venture capital flowed in on promises of mental health breakthroughs, raising valuations. Disappointing clinical trials, regulatory setbacks, and doubts about standardizing therapies then sharply reduced investor confidence. The analysis highlights tensions in subjecting these substances to capitalist logic.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Boom Venture capital Bust Volatility finance Late 19th century |
| Key finding | The boom-and-bust cycle in for-profit psychedelic medicine is driven by the concept of capitalization, where the unruliness of these substances as capitalized assets intensifies volatility. |
Abstract
Abstract This article traces the shifting fortunes of for-profit psychedelic medicine through two phases: a boom from 2016 to late 2021, followed by a bust that continued through late 2024. It argues that the forces driving this cycle are best understood through the concept of capitalization, which links present valuations to investor expectations about future earnings. Engaging the capital-as-power framework, the article situates psychedelic companies within the broader biopharmaceutical sector, showing how the volatility of drug development is intensified by the unruliness of these substances as capitalized assets. This unruliness stems from a range of factors, including murky intellectual property claims, unpredictable and intense subjective experiences, and lingering cultural stigma. During the boom, firms attracted significant interest from venture capital and other investors by promising revolutionary breakthroughs in mental health treatment. As expectations rose, so did valuations. But disappointing results from clinical trials, regulatory setbacks, and deepening doubts about the ability to control and standardize psychedelic therapies led to sharp declines in investor confidence. Analyzing financial performance alongside investor narratives, the article underscores the tensions involved in subjecting these unruly substances to the logic of capitalist power.