Islam and Psychedelics: An Essay on the Issues of Permissibility and Medical Utility
Theology and Science March 20, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2025.2472125 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractClassic psychedelic medicines do not meet the defining characteristics of intoxicants prohibited in Islamic rulings. Intoxicants are defined as substances that veil the mind (khamr), intoxicate (Sakr), cause harm and enmity. The paper compares behavior, neuroimaging, psychopharmacology, and the conscious experience of subjects taking psychedelics versus traditional intoxicants. It argues that psychedelics do not produce the same effects and therefore should not be categorized as intoxicants under Islamic law, citing historical precedent from Ibn Taymiyyah on henbane.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Law Medicine Philosophy |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key finding | Classic psychedelic medicines do not constitute the characteristics of intoxicants as defined in Islamic rulings. |
Abstract
ABSTRACT Islamic rulings on intoxicants prohibit psychoactive compounds which : veil the faculties of the mind (khamr), intoxicate (Sakr), do harm and cause enmity between people (Quran 5:91). Psychedelic drugs, recognised by some as not being within this category of intoxicants [Ibn Taymiyyah on Henbane alFataawa al-Kubra, 3/423], are still deemed intoxicants by both the Muslim world and general society. This paper demonstrates that classic psychedelic medicines do not constitute the characteristics of intoxicants. It does so by observing the following characteristics of subjects taking both types of substances: Behaviour of subjects Neuroimaging and psychopharmacology Phenomenology of the Subjects i.e. the conscious experience produced.