Repeated subcutaneous esketamine on treatment-resistant depression: An open-label dose titration study.
Fernanda Palhano-Fontes, Patrícia Cavalcanti-Ribeiro, Kaike Thiê da Costa Gonçalves, Victor Rocha Nobrega de Almeida, David C Barbosa, Marcos André de Araújo Ferreira, Raynara Bolcont, Lara Carvalho Araújo Melo De Souza, Nestor Caetano Santos, Eduardo Igor Torquato Cardoso Lopes, Nicole Bezerra de Medeiros Lima, Aldielyson Jorge Cavalcanti de Brito, Marcelo Falchi-Carvalho, Emerson Arcoverde, Draulio Araujo, Nicole Leite Galvão-Coelho
Journal of affective disorders January 15, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.141 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractEight weekly subcutaneous injections of esketamine produced a 52.17% response rate and a 34.78% remission rate in 30 patients with treatment-resistant depression, with improvements in self-reported depressive symptoms sustained for up to six months. The open-label trial lacked a control group and had a small sample size, limiting causal interpretation and generalizability. Subcutaneous administration offers a cheaper, easier alternative to intravenous or intranasal routes with comparable plasma levels and fewer side effects.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Open-label clinical trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 30 |
| Population | Patients with unipolar treatment-resistant depression |
| Intervention | Subcutaneous esketamine |
| Duration | 8-week intervention, 6-month follow-up |
| Topics | Depression Ketamine |
| Keywords | Subcutaneous Unipolar depression Depression treatment Ketamine therapy |
| Citations | 7 |
| Key finding | Eight weekly subcutaneous esketamine sessions yielded a 52.17% response rate and 34.78% remission rate, with sustained antidepressant effects up to six months. |
Abstract
Ketamine has gained prominence as one of the most effective therapeutic options in unipolar treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, most studies related to the antidepressant action of ketamine used intravenous (IV) or intranasal (IN) administration. The subcutaneous (SC) route of administration is a promising alternative, as it results in plasma levels comparable to IV, causes fewer side effects, and is easier and cheaper to administer than both IV and/or IN routes. In this context, we conducted an open-label clinical trial for investigating the efficacy and safety of 8 weekly sessions of SC esketamine in TRD patients (n = 30). At the end of the treatment, a partial response rate of 26.09 %, a response rate of 52.17 % and remission rate of 34.78 % were observed, assessed by Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Moreover, the self-reported depressive symptoms, as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), significantly decreased from the baseline to the final session, and the improvements were sustained throughout the week. Follow-up evaluations (BDI-II) up to the sixth month consistently showed scores lower than the baseline. The small sample size and the drop-out during the follow-up phase may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the absence of a control group necessitates cautious interpretation of causality. This groundbreaking study, which addresses SC esketamine treatment for TRD, reported promising response and remission rates, as well as sustained antidepressant effects. It highlights the need for further research to improve and expand our knowledge of this innovative, more accessible, and cost-effective therapeutic approach.