Skip to content

From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind.

Micah Allen, Karl J Friston

Synthese January 1, 2018 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-016-1288-5 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Predictive processing (PP) approaches to the mind vary widely, from cognitivist views that rely on modular, internal mental representations to radical enactive and embodied theories. This review maps the continuum of PP theories, showing that some emphasize body-representations while others align with dynamic, enactive accounts. The Free Energy Principle (FEP) offers a formal framework that reconciles internalist and externalist perspectives by explaining how internal representations arise from autopoietic self-organization. The FEP thus provides a foundation for empirically productive process theories, such as PP, that guide research through formal modeling of the embodied mind.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Keywords Active inference Computationalism Connectionism Embodied cognition Enactivism
Citations 387
Key finding Predictive processing theories span a continuum from cognitivist, representation-heavy accounts to radically enactive and embodied approaches, and the Free Energy Principle attempts to dissolve the tension between internalist and externalist views by deriving representations from autopoietic self-organization.

Abstract

Predictive processing (PP) approaches to the mind are increasingly popular in the cognitive sciences. This surge of interest is accompanied by a proliferation of philosophical arguments, which seek to either extend or oppose various aspects of the emerging framework. In particular, the question of how to position predictive processing with respect to enactive and embodied cognition has become a topic of intense debate. While these arguments are certainly of valuable scientific and philosophical merit, they risk underestimating the variety of approaches gathered under the predictive label. Here, we first present a basic review of neuroscientific, cognitive, and philosophical approaches to PP, to illustrate how these range from solidly cognitivist applications-with a firm commitment to modular, internalistic mental representation-to more moderate views emphasizing the importance of 'body-representations', and finally to those which fit comfortably with radically enactive, embodied, and dynamic theories of mind. Any nascent predictive processing theory (e.g., of attention or consciousness) must take into account this continuum of views, and associated theoretical commitments. As a final point, we illustrate how the Free Energy Principle (FEP) attempts to dissolve tension between internalist and externalist accounts of cognition, by providing a formal synthetic account of how internal 'representations' arise from autopoietic self-organization. The FEP thus furnishes empirically productive process theories (e.g., predictive processing) by which to guide discovery through the formal modelling of the embodied mind.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment