Neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing: A commentary on Manzotti's, "The boundaries and location of consciousness as identity theories deem fit".
Front Psychol November 15, 2022 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1058325 via PubMed Central
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThis commentary critiques neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing, responding to Manzotti's arguments about the boundaries and location of consciousness. It examines how identity theories define consciousness, questioning their assumptions and implications. The author argues that neurocentrist approaches, which equate consciousness with brain processes, face conceptual difficulties when accounting for the phenomenal character of experience. The commentary suggests that alternative frameworks may better address the relationship between neural activity and conscious experience.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing face conceptual difficulties in accounting for the phenomenal character of conscious experience. |
Abstract
Neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing: A commentary on Manzotti's, "The boundaries and location of consciousness as identity theories deem fit".