The Value and Disvalue of Consciousness.
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees October 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180116000335 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractConsciousness defines personhood and enables both pleasurable and painful experiences. This essay examines four neurological conditions—intraoperative awareness, prolonged disorders of consciousness, locked-in syndrome, and the effects of narcotics and sedation on terminally ill patients—to explore when consciousness benefits or harms patients. The ethical significance of consciousness depends on the content of one's experience and whether one can report that content to others. Phenomenal consciousness, the subjective feel of awareness, can be harmful when a patient expects unconsciousness or when it allows uncommunicated suffering. Technology enabling reliable communication could benefit neurologically compromised patients. The conditions raise the question of when consciousness is preferable to unconsciousness.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Intraoperative awareness Locked-in syndrome Minimally conscious state Pain control Sedation |
| Citations | 32 |
| Key finding | The value or disvalue of phenomenal consciousness depends on its relation to access consciousness, the ability to report or communicate the content of awareness. |
Abstract
Consciousness defines us as persons. It allows us to have both pleasurable and painful experiences. I present four neurological conditions in the clinical setting to explore how consciousness can be beneficial or harmful to patients: intraoperative awareness, prolonged disorders of consciousness, locked-in syndrome, and the effects of narcotics and sedation on terminally ill patients. The ethical significance of consciousness for patients in these conditions depends on two factors: the content of one's experience and whether one can report this content to others. I argue that the value or disvalue of phenomenal consciousness, what it is like to be aware, may depend on its relation to access consciousness, the ability to report or communicate the content of awareness. Phenomenal consciousness can have disvalue when one wants or expects to be unconscious. It can also have disvalue in the absence of access consciousness because it can allow the patient to experience pain and suffer. Technology that enabled neurologically compromised patients to reliably communicate their experience and wishes could benefit and prevent harm to them. More generally, the neurological conditions I discuss raise the question of when and in what respects consciousness is preferable to unconsciousness.