Mindfulness meditation for pulmonary hypertension program development: Acceptability and feasibility of technology-assisted complementary health intervention for symptom self-management.
Tania T Von Visger, Yu-Ping Chang
Heart & lung : the journal of critical care January 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2026.102759 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAn 8-week web-based mindfulness program for adults with pulmonary hypertension showed moderate acceptability and feasibility. Among 15 participants, 93% attended Zoom sessions, 80% viewed at least half of the videos, and 40% used the mobile app for more than two weeks. The System Usability Scale score of 81.47 indicated moderate acceptability. Participants' journals revealed four themes: perceived benefits of meditation, daily practice, awareness and acceptance, and symptom improvement. Assessing such complex behavioral interventions is critical for ensuring fidelity and guiding modifications for future implementation.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Pilot feasibility study Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 15 |
| Population | Adults with pulmonary hypertension |
| Duration | 8-week intervention |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Acceptability Feasibility Mindfulness mobile app Pulmonary hypertension ph |
| Key finding | The MMPH program demonstrated moderate acceptability and feasibility, with high Zoom attendance, moderate video engagement, and lower app use, and participants reported benefits such as improved awareness and symptom improvement. |
Abstract
Adults with pulmonary hypertension (PH) live with a high symptom burden, psychological distress, and poor quality of life. Mindfulness-based interventions delivered in person or virtually have shown clinical benefits for chronic conditions and PH. Pilot testing of the Mindfulness Meditation for Pulmonary Hypertension (MMPH), an 8-week, web-based, multimodal program, shows improvement in depression, symptoms, and quality of life. To evaluate the MMPH program's acceptability and feasibility quantitatively and qualitatively from MMPH participants. Descriptive statistics were used to report adherence to and completion of each component of MMPH (Zoom, video, and app use) among 15 participants who received the intervention in 2022-2023. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on their daily reflection journals, downloaded from the MMPH app. Fifteen participants attended 28 out of 30 Zoom sessions (93%). Twelve of 15 (80%) participants accessed the video-viewing activity at least 50% of the time (3 of 6 videos). Eight out of 15 participants (53%) used the App during the intervention period, and 6 out of 15 participants (40%) used the App for >2 weeks. The content analysis reveals four most salient themes: Perceived Benefits of Meditation, Daily Life Practice and Activity, Awareness and Acceptance, and PH Symptom Improvement. The System Usability Scale for the MMPH program was 81.47 (±10.21), indicating moderate acceptability. Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a complex behavioral health intervention, such as the MMPH program, is critical to ensuring consistent intervention fidelity. Comprehensive approaches are essential to guide necessary program modifications for future real-world implementation science testing.