Skip to content

Studies on the impact of meditation on mental health: A critical review.

Ksenija Popadić

Psychiatria Danubina April 1, 2026 DOI: 10.24869/psyd.2026.4 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Research on meditation for mental health faces key challenges: meditation covers diverse practices with different techniques, goals, and outcomes, making comparisons difficult. Standardizing protocols and operationalizing the specific type of meditation are proposed solutions. Meditators vary in experience, motivation, and characteristics, so tracking participant traits and stratifying samples in quantitative studies is essential. Repeated measurements often yield inconsistent results due to methodological shortcomings and lack of a theoretical framework. Defining measurable outcomes specific to research goals is necessary, and combining qualitative with quantitative methods helps capture subjective experiences. Interdisciplinary research incorporating psychology, philosophy, anthropology, neuroscience, biology, sociology, and comparative cultural and religious studies is recommended to better understand meditation's impact on mental processes, personality, and behavior, and to improve its application in mental health.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Critical review Qualitative Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Application Critical review Mental health
Key finding Meditation research faces challenges in definition, methodology, and participant diversity, requiring standardized protocols, interdisciplinary approaches, and combined qualitative and quantitative methods to improve understanding and application in mental health.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute to the increased understanding of research methods on meditation as a tool for preventing and improving mental health by addressing the key challenges that research faces. Different definitions of meditation have been analyzed, and the complexity of the phenomenon, as well as the problems in conceptualization, have been highlighted. It has been emphasized that comparing the results of research is complicated by the fact that meditation encompasses a wide range of practices that differ in techniques, goals, and expected outcomes. A solution to this problem is the operationalization of the type of meditation being investigated and the standardization of protocols. In addition to this, meditators represent a diverse group of individuals who differ in experience, motivation, and characteristics. Therefore, it is essential to track the characteristics of the participants closely and, when conducting quantitative research, stratify the sample according to relevant characteristics. Repeated measurements do not always yield the same results, which is attributed to numerous methodological shortcomings and a lack of a theoretical framework. The successful outcomes of meditation are often determined in various ways, so it is necessary to define measurable outcomes that are specific to the research goals. Given the difficulty of quantifying the subjective experiences resulting from meditation practice, it is beneficial to combine qualitative and quantitative measurements. Due to the complexity of the meditation phenomenon, research should be interdisciplinary, incorporating knowledge and insights from psychology, philosophy, anthropology, neuroscience, biology, sociology, and comparative studies of cultures and religions. More high-quality, qualitative, and interdisciplinary research is needed to understand better the process of meditation and its impact on mental processes, personality, and behavior, and subsequently to improve its application in the field of mental health.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment