Skip to content

Fenomenologia trascendentale e cognizione incarnata. La relazione tra soggetto, corpo e mondo nel quadro di un’ontologia naturale riformata

Edoardo Fugali

Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia December 27, 2024 DOI: 10.4453/rifp.2024.0021 via DOAJ

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

This work compares enactivist cognitive science with classical phenomenology, focusing on Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. It argues that the relationship between subject, body, and world, along with action's mediating role, supports a dynamic conception of cognition. The transcendental perspective of embodied subjectivity shows continuity among action, perception, and higher cognition, challenging mind-body duality. The text also critiques physicalist naturalism, advocating for a weak naturalism compatible with a transcendental view that grounds subjectivity in an embodied biological organism. An ontology of nature, inspired by Merleau-Ponty, emphasizes qualitative aspects of the “flesh” and overcomes limitations in Husserl's approach.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Embodied cognition Enactivism Perception Subjectivity
Key finding Enactivist cognitive science and classical phenomenology converge in challenging mind-body duality through a dynamic, embodied conception of cognition, and a weak naturalism grounded in the biological organism is proposed to overcome mechanistic assumptions.

Abstract

This contribution offers a comparison between enactivist cognitive science and classical phenomenology, with a particular focus on key figures such as Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Two central issues are explored: the relationship between subject, body, and world, and the mediating role of action within a dynamic conception of cognition. The transcendental perspective emerging from incarnate subjectivity emphasizes the continuity between action, perception, and higher cognitive functions, challenging the mind-body duality in favor of a unified and continuous phenomenological experience. The second issue addresses physicalist naturalism and the need to move beyond mechanistic assumptions, proposing a weak naturalism that remains compatible with a transcendental perspective, one that grounds subjectivity in an embodied biological organism. An ontology of nature, inspired by Merleau-Ponty, is explored, emphasizing the qualitative aspects of the “flesh” and overcoming the limitations inherent in Husserl’s approach.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment