Arketamine: a scoping review of its use in humans.
Gustavo C Leal, Isabel Lima-Araújo, David G Roiter, Ana Teresa Caliman-Fontes, Rodrigo P Mello, Flávio Kapczinski, Acioly L T Lacerda, Lucas C Quarantini
European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience December 16, 2024 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-024-01945-2 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractArketamine, an enantiomer of ketamine, has been less studied than esketamine or racemic ketamine, but recent preclinical work suggests it may have prolonged antidepressant effects and a better safety profile. This scoping review of 20 studies involving 410 subjects found arketamine was primarily investigated for pain management and depression. Early evidence indicates it may reduce pain, though most studies were small and in non-clinical settings. In psychiatry, trials show potential antidepressant effects, but results are inconsistent and some studies unpublished. A consistent finding is arketamine's favorable safety profile, with fewer dissociative and psychotomimetic effects than esketamine or racemic ketamine. Larger, well-designed studies are needed to determine its therapeutic potential.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Scoping review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 410 |
| Population | Human subjects administered arketamine |
| Intervention | Arketamine |
| Topics | Ketamine |
| Keywords | Antidepressant Pain management Depression treatment |
| Citations | 7 |
| Key finding | Arketamine may offer a favorable safety profile with lower incidences of dissociative and psychotomimetic effects compared to esketamine and racemic ketamine, but evidence for antidepressant effects is inconsistent and most studies are small. |
Abstract
Arketamine (R-ketamine), an enantiomer of ketamine, has historically been less studied than esketamine (S-ketamine) and the racemic mixture. Recent preclinical studies suggest that arketamine may offer prolonged antidepressant effects and a superior safety profile. This scoping review aims to assess and synthesise existing literature on the clinical use of arketamine in humans. This review follows the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews guidelines, with a comprehensive search conducted in PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Eligible studies included those reporting the administration of arketamine to humans. Data were extracted and synthesised descriptively. A total of 20 studies involving 410 subjects were included. Arketamine was primarily investigated for pain management and depression. While early evidence suggests arketamine may be effective in reducing pain, most studies were small and conducted in non-clinical settings. In psychiatry, trials indicate potential antidepressant effects, but results are inconsistent, and some studies remain unpublished. A consistent observation across most studies is arketamine's favourable safety profile, showing lower incidences of dissociative and psychotomimetic effects compared to esketamine and racemic ketamine. Arketamine may have a role in pain management and psychiatry, with a favourable safety profile compared to other forms of ketamine. However, the small scale of many studies limits the generalizability of findings, and results in depression trials are mixed. Larger, well-designed studies, possibly with higher doses, are needed to determine its therapeutic potential and establish its place in clinical practice.