Skip to content

The Evolving Role of History in the Past, Present, and Future of Psychedelic Patenting

Shahin Shams, Amanda Rose Pratt, Sisi Li, Tom Isenbarger

History of Pharmacy and Pharmaceuticals October 1, 2023 DOI: 10.3368/hopp.65.1.117 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The resurgence of mainstream psychedelic research has led to capitalist interest in patenting to exclude competitors, with some exploiting the process to monopolize well-established knowledge through overly broad claims. Historical psychedelic prior art—evidence that something claimed is already known—is critical for preventing such patents, but because some prior art exists in nontraditional forms, patent examiners may miss it, resulting in erroneously granted patents. Organizations and activists introduce historical prior art directly to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, while the online library Porta Sophia curates archival prior art for examiners and innovators. Ensuring an equitable landscape is essential for research and protecting vulnerable communities with cultural ties to psychedelics.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Keywords Trademark Intellectual property Leverage statistics Mainstream Context archaeology
Citations 4
Key finding Historical psychedelic prior art is critical for preventing overly broad patents, but its nontraditional forms can lead to erroneous patent grants.

Abstract

Abstract The resurgence of mainstream psychedelic research has spurred a capitalist interest in patenting to exclude competitors from producing, using, or selling psychedelic technology. Some exploit the patenting process to monopolize well-established psychedelic knowledge with overly broad claims. If patent examiners find evidence, known as “prior art,” showing that what is claimed is known, patent rights are not granted. Historical psychedelic prior art therefore plays a critical role in shaping the future of patent law in the context of psychedelic capitalism. Given that some psychedelic prior art exists in nontraditional forms, patent examiners may not be able to identify relevant prior art to nullify overly broad claims. Consequently, several psychedelic patents have erroneously been granted. Organizations and intellectual property activists leverage direct methods of introducing historical psychedelic prior art to fight these overly broad patents and applications on a claim-by-claim basis with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Valuable historical archival psychedelic prior art is likewise curated and made available to patent examiners and innovators through the work of the online psychedelic prior art library Porta Sophia and its broad interdisciplinary network of experts. The psychedelic field is at a critical developmental juncture, and it is essential that all involved work to ensure that its landscape remains equitable, research can flourish, and vulnerable communities with strong cultural connections to psychedelics are protected.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment