Self and Self-Transcendence
Buddhism and Human Flourishing January 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37027-5_6 via Springer Nature
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe chapter examines the Buddhist doctrine of anattā (non-self), clarifying its meaning and common misunderstandings. It argues that the self is best understood as a set of interrelated reflective organismic processes rather than a fixed entity. The text explores why Buddhism considers the self problematic and investigates the possibility of self-transcendence, discussing non-dual experiencing in spontaneous, meditative, and psychedelic contexts. It also addresses how insights from such experiences may or may not be integrated into ongoing behavior.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | The self is best understood as a set of interrelated reflective organismic processes, and self-transcendence through non-dual experiencing may be possible but its integration into ongoing behavior varies. |
Abstract
This chapter explores the foundations of the Buddhist doctrine of the anattā or “non-self,” and what the concept means and does not mean. It then examines the utility and limitations of the doctrine and proposes that the self is best understood as a set of interrelated reflective organismic processes. The chapter explains why Buddhism views the self as problematic and explores the degree to which self-transcendence may be possible. In the section on self-transcendence, the chapter discusses the nature of non-dual experiencing in spontaneous, meditative, and psychedelic contexts. It includes a discussion of the degree to which insights gleaned from non-dual experiencing can be integrated or fail to be integrated in ongoing behavior.