Skip to content

Self and Self-Transcendence

Seth Zuihō Segall

Buddhism and Human Flourishing January 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37027-5_6 via Springer Nature

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The chapter examines the Buddhist doctrine of anattā (non-self), clarifying its meaning and common misunderstandings. It argues that the self is best understood as a set of interrelated reflective organismic processes rather than a fixed entity. The text explores why Buddhism considers the self problematic and investigates the possibility of self-transcendence, discussing non-dual experiencing in spontaneous, meditative, and psychedelic contexts. It also addresses how insights from such experiences may or may not be integrated into ongoing behavior.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key finding The self is best understood as a set of interrelated reflective organismic processes, and self-transcendence through non-dual experiencing may be possible but its integration into ongoing behavior varies.

Abstract

This chapter explores the foundations of the Buddhist doctrine of the anattā or “non-self,” and what the concept means and does not mean. It then examines the utility and limitations of the doctrine and proposes that the self is best understood as a set of interrelated reflective organismic processes. The chapter explains why Buddhism views the self as problematic and explores the degree to which self-transcendence may be possible. In the section on self-transcendence, the chapter discusses the nature of non-dual experiencing in spontaneous, meditative, and psychedelic contexts. It includes a discussion of the degree to which insights gleaned from non-dual experiencing can be integrated or fail to be integrated in ongoing behavior.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment