Emerging psychoactive substance use among regular ecstasy users in Australia.
Raimondo Bruno, Allison J Matthews, Matthew Dunn, Rosa Alati, Fairlie Mcilwraith, Sophie Hickey, Lucy Burns, Natasha Sindicich
Drug and alcohol dependence July 1, 2012 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.11.020 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMore than a quarter (28%) of regular ecstasy users in Australia had used an emerging psychoactive substance (EPS) in the past six months, most often a stimulant like mephedrone (17%) rather than a psychedelic like 5-MeO-DMT (13%). Users of stimulant EPS resembled mainstream ecstasy users in demographics and risk behaviors, while psychedelic EPS users were a distinct subgroup who started ecstasy earlier, used more multiple substances (cannabis, inhalants, GHB, ketamine), and experienced more legal, psychological, and social problems. The demographic similarity of stimulant EPS consumers and positive responses to these drugs, combined with declining ecstasy purity, suggest stimulant EPS may expand further into ecstasy markets and pose greater public health risks.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Cross-sectional survey Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 693 |
| Population | Regular (at least monthly) ecstasy users in Australia |
| Citations | 58 |
| Key finding | 28% of regular ecstasy users had used an emerging psychoactive substance in the past six months, with stimulant EPS users resembling mainstream ecstasy users and psychedelic EPS users being a distinct, higher-risk polydrug-using subgroup. |
Abstract
The past decade has seen the development of an array of emerging psychoactive substances (EPS), however, there is minimal information on the extent of their use outside Europe. This study aimed to determine the extent of use of EPS from stimulant (such as mephedrone) and psychedelic classes (such as 5-methoxy-dimethyltryptamine [5-MeO-DMT]) among an Australian sample of regular ecstasy users (REU). Further, to determine if consumers of these drugs represent a distinct subgroup of REU. Australian national cross-sectional surveys of 693 regular (at least monthly) ecstasy users conducted during 2010. More than one quarter (28%) of REU had used an EPS in the past six months, most commonly from the stimulant class (20%, typically mephedrone, 17%) rather than the psychedelic class (13%). Demographics and risk behaviours of REU that used stimulant EPS were largely no different from non-EPS consuming REU. Those using psychedelic EPS were distinct, initiating ecstasy use earlier, more frequently using multiple substances (cannabis, inhalants, GHB, ketamine) and more commonly experiencing legal, psychological and social problems. Psychedelic EPS use appears largely restricted to a distinct subset of REU with high-level non-injecting polydrug use, but use appears generally limited. The demographic similarity of stimulant EPS consumers with 'mainstream' REU, in conjunction with positive responses to the psychoactive effects of these drugs and declining ecstasy purity, suggests strong potential for stimulant EPS to expand further into ecstasy markets. Such drugs may have a greater public health impact than ecstasy, and merit careful monitoring into the future.