Psilocybin as a Transdiagnostic Treatment for Eating Disorders and Comorbid Psychopathology: Implications for Clinical Nosology and Research Directions
Elena Koning, Jérémie Richard, Aaron Keshen
International Journal of Eating Disorders July 2, 2026 DOI: 10.1002/eat.70164 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPsilocybin treatment shows promise as a transdiagnostic intervention for eating disorders and their common psychiatric comorbidities. Preliminary clinical evidence supports its feasibility, safety, and therapeutic effects, with robust transdiagnostic effects observed across comorbid conditions. Proposed mechanisms include serotonergic receptor agonism, psychoplastogenic effects, and neural network desynchronization that target shared vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities map onto dimensional constructs in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (Emotional Dysfunction superspectrum, Internalizing spectrum) and Research Domain Criteria (negative/positive valence, cognitive, and social process domains). Future research should explore pragmatic trial designs and dimensional outcome measures to capture real-world complexities.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Narrative review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Intervention | Psilocybin treatment |
| Topics | Psilocybin |
| Keywords | Psychopathology Research domain criteria Comorbidity Clinical trial Eating disorders |
| Key finding | Preliminary clinical evidence supports the feasibility, safety, and therapeutic effects of psilocybin treatment for eating disorders, with robust transdiagnostic effects across comorbid conditions. |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Eating disorders (EDs) are characterized by high rates of psychiatric comorbidity and suboptimal treatment outcomes. There remain critical gaps in research, including the exploration of effective transdiagnostic interventions. This forum article examines the potential of psilocybin treatment (PT) as a transdiagnostic intervention for EDs and common comorbidities, including the implications for alternative nosological frameworks, trial design, and clinical care. METHOD: A narrative review was conducted synthesizing clinical, mechanistic, and conceptual literature on PT for EDs and common psychiatric comorbidities. Searches of academic databases were supplemented by hand-searching and clinical trial registries. Thematic synthesis focused on transdiagnostic clinical evidence, mechanistic theories, and implications for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), treatment development, and clinical trial design. RESULTS: Preliminary clinical evidence supports the feasibility, safety, and therapeutic effects of PT for EDs, with robust transdiagnostic effects observed across comorbid conditions. Proposed mechanisms (i.e., serotonergic receptor agonism, psychoplastogenic effects, neural network desynchronization) target shared vulnerabilities that map onto dimensional constructs in HiTOP (Emotional Dysfunction superspectrum, Internalizing spectrum) and RDoC (negative/positive valence, cognitive, and social process domains) nosologies. Future research should explore pragmatic trial designs and dimensional outcome measures to capture the real-world complexities of PT for EDs. DISCUSSION: PT demonstrates transdiagnostic therapeutic potential for EDs, and the advancement of dimensional nosologies, complex intervention frameworks, and personalized treatment protocols may address existing gaps in research and clinical care.