Skip to content

A phase 1 study of a second experience with Group Retreat Psilocybin Therapy for partial responders after a first experience

Anthony L. Back, Bonnie A. Mcgregor, Leslie L. Thorn, Kalin Harvey, Dianna Blom, George Callan, John Guy, Sameet Kumar, Rob Hershberg, Melissa Layer, Jackie Levin, Susanna Myers, Juliana Pérez, Kathy Salmonson, Peter Thompson, Joseph Whinney

Frontiers in Public Health April 14, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1810904 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A second experience of group retreat psilocybin therapy appears safe and feasible for people with metastatic cancer who did not fully benefit from a first session. In a small study of 13 partial responders, the protocol was modified with a higher initial dose (35 mg), an optional 10 mg booster, and no requirement to taper antidepressants. Seven participants received the booster. Anxiety and depression scores improved substantially, with 69% of participants scoring below the clinical threshold at follow-up. The proportion reporting a complete mystical experience rose from 38% after the first session to 77% after the second, without more challenging experiences. Social support and group cohesion also improved and were maintained at 24 weeks.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Single-arm Phase 1 study Peer reviewed
Sample size 13
Population Patients with metastatic cancer who were partial responders to prior group retreat psilocybin therapy
Intervention Group Retreat Psilocybin Therapy
Dose 35 mg initial dose, optional 10 mg booster
Duration Single dosing day, 24-week follow-up
Key finding A second experience of group retreat psilocybin therapy with a higher dose and optional booster was safe, feasible, and associated with enhanced mystical experiences and sustained improvements in anxiety and depression among partial responders.

Abstract

Introduction: Psilocybin therapy has demonstrated efficacy for cancer-related anxiety and depression, but resource-intensive individual treatment models raise important questions for psychedelic public health about equitable access and scalability. In our prior Phase 1/2 study of group retreat psilocybin therapy for patients with metastatic cancer, we observed partial responders who did not achieve full therapeutic benefit. No published research has examined whether partial responders might benefit from a second psilocybin therapy experience. Methods: We conducted a single-arm Phase 1 study to assess the safety of a second experience of Group Retreat Psilocybin Therapy for partial responders from our prior study. Protocol modifications addressed dose as a potential contributor to partial response: the initial dose was increased to 35 mg, and an optional 10 mg booster could be requested by participants who reported low subjective effect at 60-90 min and passed a safety check. Pre-retreat antidepressant tapering was not required. The intervention was delivered in a group retreat format with four primary facilitators and included three preparation sessions, a single psilocybin dosing day, and four integration sessions. Results: = 1). Seven participants (54%) received the booster dose. Mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total scores decreased from 15.08 (SD 4.35) at baseline to 9.00 (SD 4.62) at Day +8, with improvements maintained through 24-week follow-up (mean 10.42, SD 6.93); 69% achieved HADS scores below the clinical threshold. The proportion of participants with a "complete" mystical experience (Mystical Experience Questionnaire ≥ 60%) increased from 38% in the first experience to 77% in the second, without an increase in challenging experiences (Challenging Experiences Questionnaire). Social support, social identification, and group cohesion scores showed progressive improvements that persisted at 24 weeks. Discussion: A second experience of group retreat psilocybin therapy was safe and feasible for partial responders with metastatic cancer. The protocol modifications-higher dose, optional booster, and no antidepressant tapering requirement-did not introduce new safety concerns and were associated with substantially enhanced mystical experiences and preliminary efficacy signals. These findings support further investigation of retreatment protocols for partial responders and contribute to developing scalable group-based models relevant to psychedelic public health, where the resource intensity of individual treatment remains a fundamental barrier to population-level access.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment