Quantitative change of EEG and respiration signals during mindfulness meditation
Asieh Ahani, Helané Wahbeh, Hooman Nezamfar, Meghan Miller, Deniz Erdogmus, Barry Oken
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation May 14, 2014 DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-87 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA classifier combining EEG and respiration signals can distinguish between meditation and control conditions with 85% accuracy in older novice meditators after a 6-week mindfulness meditation intervention. Using only EEG signals achieved 78% accuracy. The classifier, based on spectral and phase analysis, may serve as an objective marker for meditation ability and could quantify meditation depth and experience in future research.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 34 |
| Population | Older people with high stress level |
| Intervention | Mindfulness meditation |
| Duration | 6-week meditation intervention |
| Citations | 165 |
| Key finding | A support vector machine classifier using EEG and respiration signals discriminated between meditation and control conditions with 85% accuracy, outperforming a classifier using EEG alone (78%). |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigates measures of mindfulness meditation (MM) as a mental practice, in which a resting but alert state of mind is maintained. A population of older people with high stress level participated in this study, while electroencephalographic (EEG) and respiration signals were recorded during a MM intervention. The physiological signals during meditation and control conditions were analyzed with signal processing. METHODS: EEG and respiration data were collected and analyzed on 34 novice meditators after a 6-week meditation intervention. Collected data were analyzed with spectral analysis, phase analysis and classification to evaluate an objective marker for meditation. RESULTS: Different frequency bands showed differences in meditation and control conditions. Furthermore, we established a classifier using EEG and respiration signals with a higher accuracy (85%) at discriminating between meditation and control conditions than a classifier using the EEG signal only (78%). CONCLUSION: Support vector machine (SVM) classifier with EEG and respiration feature vector is a viable objective marker for meditation ability. This classifier should be able to quantify different levels of meditation depth and meditation experience in future studies.