Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science

The Buddhist concept of mindfulness, central to many Western psychological interventions, originates from a centuries-old systematic investigation of subjective experience. Current enthusiasm for mindfulness in Western science has led to many different definitions, measurements, and self-report questionnaires that treat it as a stable personality trait. This paper identifies persistent problems with these attempts and warns that they risk distorting, diluting, or reifying the original Buddhist ideas. To properly understand and measure mindfulness, psychologists and scientists may need to study Buddhist phenomenology more deeply and engage in long-term direct practice of insight meditation, a step that seems necessary before any valid characterization or quantification can occur.

Study at a glance

Abstract

The Buddhist construct of mindfulness is a central element of mindfulness-based interventions and derives from a systematic phenomenological programme developed over several millennia to investigate subjective experience. Enthusiasm for ‘mindfulness’ in Western psychological and other science has resulted in proliferation of definitions, operationalizations and self-report inventories that purport to measure mindful awareness as a trait. This paper addresses a number of seemingly intractable issues regarding current attempts to characterize mindfulness and also highlights a number of vulnerabilities in this domain that may lead to denaturing, distortion, dilution or reification of Buddhist constructs related to mindfulness. Enriching positivist Western psychological paradigms with a detailed and complex Buddhist phenomenology of the mind may require greater study and long-term direct practice of insight meditation than is currently common among psychologists and other scientists. Pursuit of such an approach would seem a necessary precondition for attempts to characterize and quantify mindfulness.