Research abuses against people of colour and other vulnerable groups in early psychedelic research
Dana Strauss, Sara de la Salle, Jordan Sloshower, Monnica T Williams
Journal of Medical Ethics July 12, 2021 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107262 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractEarly US psychedelic research (1950-1980) exploited people of colour and other vulnerable groups, including incarcerated individuals and inpatients with psychotic disorders. A review of empirical publications from that era, assessed against current ethical standards, reveals that participants were often administered drugs without proper informed consent and under conditions of undue influence. The Central Intelligence Agency covertly funded some of this work. These historical abuses demand that contemporary psychedelic researchers adopt culturally inclusive and socially responsible methods to avoid repeating past harms.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | People of colour, incarcerated individuals, and inpatients with psychotic disorders in the USA (1950-1980) |
| Citations | 70 |
| Key finding | Historical US psychedelic research exploited people of colour and other vulnerable populations through questionable methods, lack of informed consent, and covert CIA funding. |
Abstract
There is a growing resurgence in the study of psychedelic medicines for the treatment of mental health and substance use disorders. However, certain early investigations are marred by questionable research methods, abuses against research participants, and covert Central Intelligence Agency financial involvement. The purpose of this study was to understand how and to what extent people of colour and other vulnerable populations, specifically, individuals who were incarcerated or incapacitated due to mental health issues (inpatients with psychotic disorders), were exploited during the first wave of psychedelic research in the USA (1950-1980). To do so, we reviewed available empirical publications according to current ethical standards. Variables of interest included race and ethnicity of participants, population vulnerability, drug administration conditions, informed consent and undue influence. Our findings draw attention to the history of research abuses against people of colour in Western psychedelic research. In light of these findings, we urge a call-to-action to current psychedelic researchers to prioritise culturally inclusive and socially responsible research methods in current and future studies.