Prevalence of Use Study for Amphetamine (AMP), Methamphetamine (MAMP), 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) in Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS) Specimens
K. L. Klette, A. R. Kettle, M. H. Jamerson
Journal of Analytical Toxicology June 1, 2006 DOI: 10.1093/jat/30.5.319 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractOver four months, 85,658 urine specimens from applicants to the United States Armed Forces were screened for amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDA, MDMA, and MDEA using two immunoassays. The Roche Online Amphetamine immunoassay flagged 216 specimens as presumptively positive; 70 confirmed positive for amphetamine and 87 for amphetamine and/or methamphetamine, a 73% confirmation rate. The Microgenics DRI Ecstasy immunoassay flagged eight specimens; five confirmed positive for MDMA and/or MDA, a 63% confirmation rate. The overall prevalence of any of these drugs in military entrance processing stations specimens was 0.19%.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 85,658 |
| Population | Applicants seeking to join the United States Armed Forces |
| Duration | 4-month period |
| Topics | MDMA |
| Keywords | Methamphetamine Chemistry Chromatography |
| Citations | 13 |
| Key finding | The overall prevalence of amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDA, MDMA, and/or MDEA in urine specimens from military entrance applicants was 0.19%. |
Abstract
The Roche Abuscreen Onlinetrade mark Amphetamine immunoassay (IA), modified to include sodium periodate, and the Microgenics DRI Ecstasy IA were used to determine the prevalence of amphetamine (AMP), methamphetamine (MAMP), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) in urine specimens from applicants seeking to join the United States Armed Forces. Over a 4-month period, a total of 85,658 specimens were IA screened using the Department of Defense 500 ng/mL administrative cutoff level for AMP and MDMA. All presumptively positive specimens were confirmed using a solid-phase extraction procedure coupled with simultaneous analysis of AMP, MAMP, MDA, MDMA, and MDEA by fast gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using the same cutoff levels as the IA. The Roche Online Amphetamine IA identified 216 specimens as presumptively positive; of these, 70 specimens confirmed positive for AMP and 87 specimens confirmed positive for AMP and/or MAMP, resulting in a confirmation rate of 73%. The Microgenics DRI Ecstasy IA identified eight specimens as presumptively positive; of these, five specimens confirmed positive for MDMA and/or MDA, resulting in a confirmation rate of 63%. The total use prevalence for AMP, MAMP, MDA, MDMA, and/or MDEA in military entrance processing stations specimens over the testing period was determined to be 0.19%.