Determination of MDMA and MDA in rat urine by semi‐micro column HPLC‐fluorescence detection with DBD‐F and their monitoring after MDMA administration to rat
Mitsuhiro Wada, Shinichi Nakamura, Mamoru Tomita, Mihoko N. Nakashima, Kenichiro Nakashima
Luminescence May 1, 2005 DOI: 10.1002/bio.821 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA method using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection was developed to measure the abused drugs MDMA, MDA, amphetamine, and methamphetamine in rat urine. The drugs were labeled with a fluorescent reagent and separated within 45 minutes. Detection limits ranged from 0.5 to 15 ng/mL. After a single injection of MDMA to rats, both MDMA and its metabolite MDA could be detected in urine for up to 15 hours, with concentrations ranging from 0.13 to 160.1 µg/mL for MDMA and 0.17 to 10.9 µg/mL for MDA.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Experimental method development Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 3 |
| Population | Rat urine |
| Intervention | MDMA |
| Dose | 2.0 mg/kg |
| Duration | 15 hours post-administration |
| Topics | MDMA |
| Keywords | High-performance liquid chromatography Detection limit Reagent Fluorescence |
| Citations | 14 |
| Key finding | The developed HPLC method with fluorescence detection can simultaneously quantify MDMA, MDA, amphetamine, and methamphetamine in rat urine with detection limits as low as 0.5 ng/mL. |
Abstract
Abstract A simultaneous semi‐micro column HPLC method with fluorescence detection of abused drugs, such as 3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), 3,4‐methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), amphetamine (AP) and methamphetamine (MP) in rat urine was examined by using 4‐( N , N ‐dimethylaminosulphonyl)‐7‐fluoro‐1,2,3‐benzoxadiazole (DBD‐F) as a labelling reagent and α ‐phenylethylamine as an internal standard (IS). A sample (50 µL) of rat urine was added to 5 µL IS and 100 µL 100 mmol[sol ]L borate buffer (pH 12) and extracted with 1.5 mL n ‐hexane. After evaporation, 50 µL 75 mmol[sol ]L borate buffer (pH 8.5) and 50 µL 20 mmol[sol ]L DBD‐F in CH 3 CN were added to the residue and mixed well. The resultant solution was heated for 20 min at 80°C and then cooled in an ice bath. A good separation of DBD‐derivatives could be achieved within 45 min using a semi‐micro ODS column with an eluent of CH 3 CN[sol ]CH 3 OH[sol ]10 mmol[sol ]L imidazole–HNO 3 buffer (pH 7.0) (= 45:5:50, v[sol ]v[sol ]v %). The DBD derivatives were monitored at 565 nm with an excitation at 470 nm. The calibration curves showed good linearity ( r = 0.997) with 0.5–15 ng[sol ]mL detection limits at a S[sol ]N ratio of 3. MDMA and MDA in rat urine could be monitored for 15 h after a single administration of MDMA to rat (2.0 mg[sol ]kg, i.p.). The concentrations for MDMA and MDA ( n = 3) were 0.13–160.1 and 0.17–10.9 µg[sol ]mL, respectively. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.