Skip to content

5‐HT loss in rat brain following 3, 4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), p‐chloroamphetamine and fenfluramine administration and effects of chlormethiazole and dizocilpine

María Isabel Colado, Tracey K. Murray, A.r. Green

British Journal of Pharmacology March 1, 1993 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb12846.x via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Chlormethiazole and dizocilpine prevent neurotoxicity from MDMA (Ecstasy) but not from PCA or fenfluramine in rat brain. MDMA caused about 30% loss of serotonin and its metabolite in cortex and hippocampus; chlormethiazole given before and after MDMA fully protected both regions, while dizocilpine protected only the hippocampus. A single dose of chlormethiazole 20 minutes after MDMA also fully protected the hippocampus but not the cortex and reduced MDMA-induced hyperthermia (about +2.5°C). PCA caused 70% serotonin loss; neither drug prevented this, even when a lower PCA dose caused only 30% loss. Fenfluramine-induced serotonin loss was also not prevented. Both drugs blocked serotonin-related behaviors from all three toxins. The findings suggest different mechanisms underlie neurotoxicity from these amphetamines, and hyperthermia alone does not account for the damage.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Experimental study Peer reviewed
Population Rat brain
Interventions Chlormethiazole Dizocilpine MDMA PCA Fenfluramine
Dose MDMA 20 mg/kg, chlormethiazole 50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg, dizocilpine 1 mg/kg, PCA 5 mg/kg or 2.5 mg/kg, fenfluramine 25 mg/kg
Duration 4 days
Topics MDMA Serotonin
Keywords Dizocilpine P-chloroamphetamine Chemistry Hippocampus
Citations 133
Key finding Chlormethiazole and dizocilpine prevent MDMA-induced serotonin neurotoxicity but not that from PCA or fenfluramine, indicating different mechanisms of damage.

Abstract

1. The present study has investigated whether the neurotoxic effects of the relatively selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) neurotoxins, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or 'Ecstasy'), p-chloroamphetamine (PCA) and fenfluramine on hippocampal and cortical 5-HT terminals in rat brain could be prevented by administration of either chlormethiazole or dizocilpine. 2. Administration of MDMA (20 mg kg-1, i.p.) resulted in an approximate 30% loss of cortical and hippocampal 5-HT and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) content 4 days later. Injection of chlormethiazole (50 mg kg-1) 5 min before and 55 min after the MDMA provided complete protection in both regions, while dizocilpine (1 mg kg-1, i.p.) protected only the hippocampus. 3. Administration of a single dose of chlormethiazole (100 mg kg-1) 20 min after the MDMA also provided complete protection to the hippocampus but not the cortex. This regime also attenuated the sustained hyperthermia (approx +2.5 degrees C) induced by the MDMA injection. 4. Injection of PCA (5 mg kg-1, i.p.) resulted in a 70% loss of 5-HT and 5-HIAA content in hippocampus and cortex 4 days later. Injection of chlormethiazole (100 mg kg-1, i.p.) or dizocilpine (1 mg kg-1, i.p.) 5 min before and 55 min after the PCA failed to protect against the neurotoxicity, nor was protection afforded by chlormethiazole when a lower dose of PCA (2.5 mg kg-1, i.p.) was given which produced only a 30% loss of 5-HT content. Chlormethiazole did prevent the hyperthermia induced by PCA (5 mg kg-1), while the lower dose of PCA (2.5 mg kg-1) did not produce a change in body temperature.5. Neither chlormethiazole nor dizocilpine prevented the neurotoxic loss of hippocampal or cortical 5-HT neurones measured 4 days following administration of fenfluramine (25 mg kg-1, i.p.).6. In general, chlormethiazole and dizocilpine were effective antagonists of the 5-HT-mediated behaviours of head weaving and forepaw treading which appeared following injection of all three neurotoxins.7. Both chlormethiazole and dizocilpine have previously been shown to prevent the neurotoxic effects ofa high dose of methamphetamine on cerebral 5-HT and dopamine pathways. These drugs also prevent MDMA-induced neurotoxicity of 5-HT pathways, but not that induced by injection of PCA or fenfluramine. This suggests that the mechanisms of neurotoxic damage to 5-HT pathways produced by substituted amphetamines cannot be identical. The monoamine loss does not appear to result from the hyperthermia produced by the neurotoxic compounds.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment