Skip to content

Non‐linear pharmacokinetics of MDMA (‘ecstasy’) in humans

Rafael de la Torre, Magı́ Farré, Jordi Ortuño, Manuel Mas, Rudolf Brenneisen, P. N. Roset, Jordi Segura, Jordi Camı́

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology February 1, 2000 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00121.x via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

MDMA (ecstasy) shows nonlinear pharmacokinetics in humans: as the dose increases, plasma concentrations rise disproportionately, meaning small dose increases lead to much higher drug levels. In a controlled trial with 14 healthy volunteers given 50–150 mg, urinary recovery of the metabolite HMMA stayed constant while MDMA recovery rose, suggesting saturation or inhibition of the demethylenation metabolic step. Nonrenal clearance was dose-dependent while urinary clearance remained constant. This nonlinearity occurs regardless of CYP2D6 genotype, implying that even moderate dose increases in recreational use can produce unexpectedly high plasma concentrations, raising the risk of acute toxicity for all users, not just the 10% genetically deficient in CYP2D6.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Clinical trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 14
Population Healthy volunteers
Intervention MDMA
Dose 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, 75 mg, 125 mg
Topics MDMA
Keywords Pharmacokinetics Pharmacology Methamphetamine
Key finding MDMA pharmacokinetics are nonlinear across recreational doses, so small dose increases produce disproportionately higher plasma concentrations, increasing acute toxicity risk for all users regardless of CYP2D6 genotype.

Abstract

Aims 3,4‐Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, commonly called ecstasy) is a synthetic compound increasingly popular as a recreational drug. Little is known about its pharmacology, including its metabolism and pharmacokinetics, in humans in controlled settings. A clinical trial was designed for the evaluation of MDMA pharmacological effects and pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Methods A total of 14 subjects were included. In the pilot phase six received MDMA at 50 (n=2), 100 (n=2), and 150 mg (n=2). In the second phase eight received MDMA at both 75 and 125 mg (n =8). Subjects were phenotyped for CYP2D6 activity and were classified as extensive metabolizers for substrates, such as MDMA, whose hepatic metabolism is regulated by this enzyme. Plasma and urine samples were collected throughout the study for the evaluation of MDMA pharmacokinetics. Body fluids were analysed for the determination of MDMA and its main metabolites 3,4‐methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxy‐methamphetamine (HMMA) and 4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxy‐amphetamine (HMA). Results As the dose of MDMA administered was increased, volunteers showed rises in MDMA concentrations that did not follow the same proportionality which could be indicative of nonlinearity. In the full range of doses tested the constant recovery of HMMA in the urine combined with the increasing MDMA recovery seems to point towards a saturation or an inhibition of MDMA metabolism (the demethylenation step). These observations are further supported by the fact that urinary clearance was rather constant while nonrenal clearance was dose dependent. Conclusions It has previously been postulated that individuals genetically deficient for the hepatic enzyme CYP2D6 (about 10% of the Caucasian people) were at risk of developing acute toxicity at moderate doses of MDMA because the drug would accumulate in the body instead of being metabolized and inactivated. The lack of linearity of MDMA pharmacokinetics (in a window of doses compatible with its recreational use) is a more general phenomenon as it concerns the whole population independent of their CYP2D6 genotype. It implies that relatively small increases in the dose of MDMA ingested are translated to disproportionate rises in MDMA plasma concentrations and hence subjects are more prone to develop acute toxicity.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment