Skip to content

Next-Step Treatment Options for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Insights From the Mayo Clinic Depression Center Panel.

Matheus G Marques, Aysegul Özerdem, Simon Kung, Jennifer L Vande Voort, Hannah K Betcher, Melanie Gentry, Marin Veldic, Katherine M Moore, Paul E Croarkin, Brandan K Penaluna, Stefanie Cavalcanti, Mark A Frye, Balwinder Singh

The Journal of clinical psychiatry January 21, 2026 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25cs16066 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

For treatment-resistant depression (TRD), a panel of 10 psychiatrists reached strong consensus on recommending augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and ketamine/esketamine as next-step treatments after three failed antidepressant trials. Treatment preferences shifted to include nonaugmentative antidepressants and electroconvulsive therapy depending on patient characteristics such as metabolic disease and age. The findings underscore the importance of tailoring TRD treatment strategies to individual patient factors beyond conventional guideline tiers.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Modified Delphi consensus Peer reviewed
Sample size 10
Population Psychiatrists at the Mayo Clinic Depression Center
Interventions second-generation antipsychotics transcranial magnetic stimulation ketamine/esketamine nonaugmentative antidepressants electroconvulsive therapy
Citations 1
Key finding Strong consensus emerged recommending augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and ketamine/esketamine as next-step treatments for TRD, with preferences shifting based on patient characteristics.

Abstract

Objective: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects one-third of patients with major depressive disorder, leading to increased morbidity, health care costs, and suicide risk. TRD lacks a standardized definition, complicating treatment selection. Current guidelines often group treatments broadly without clear prioritization, and evidence gaps persist, particularly regarding newer interventions and real-world clinical complexity. A simulated case-based discussion, modeling a modified Delphi consensus, was conducted to offer a clinical perspective to this gap. Participants: A panel of 10 psychiatrists, directly engaged in the treatment of TRD at the Mayo Clinic Depression Center, participated in the surveys. Evidence: Results represent expert opinion from participants. The process included an initial group review of TRD, where participants reviewed and presented a summary on each TRD treatment option, followed by discussion. Process: Using a structured clinical vignette of a patient with TRD after 3 antidepressant trials, statements regarding next-step treatments were created through iterative ranking of options. Six vignette variations reflecting common clinical considerations (eg, metabolic disease, age) were included. Agreement was measured in 3 anonymous survey rounds, with group discussions in between. Conclusions: Strong consensus emerged recommending augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and ketamine/ esketamine as next-step treatments in the base vignette. Treatment preferences shifted to include nonaugmentative antidepressants and electroconvulsive therapy based on changes in patient characteristics. This study highlights the importance of tailoring treatment strategies for TRD to patient factors that extend beyond conventional guideline tiers. Integrating multidisciplinary perspectives and patient preferences holds promise for enhancing therapeutic selection and advancing personalized care in TRD.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment