Skip to content

Did Serendipity Contribute to the Discovery of New Antidepressant Drugs? Historical Analysis Using Operational Criteria.

Francisco López-Muñoz, Pilar D'Ocón, Alejandro Romero, Domenico De Berardis, Cecilio Álamo

Alpha psychiatry April 1, 2025 DOI: 10.31083/AP40037 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Most new antidepressants, including SSRIs, SNRIs, and other modern classes, were developed through rational, targeted design rather than chance. Only moclobemide and ketamine involved serendipity: moclobemide's antidepressant effect was discovered after chance observation of MAO inhibition during antihyperlipidemic research, and ketamine's antidepressant properties emerged from illicit use observations, not its original development as an anesthetic. The majority follow a type IV pattern where serendipity played no role.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Historical analysis Peer reviewed
Population Antidepressant drugs
Keywords History of medicine Antidepressants/ssris/psychotropics Drug development/pharmaceutical research Psychopharmacology/psychoactive drugs Serendipity/accidental discovery/chance findings
Citations 3
Key finding Most new antidepressants were developed through rational design without serendipity, except moclobemide (type II pattern) and ketamine (type III pattern).

Abstract

Given their great importance, as one of the most prescribed types of therapeutic drugs worldwide, we have analyzed the role of serendipity in the discovery of new antidepressants, ranging from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to more contemporary developments. We carried out a historical analysis of the discovery of new antidepressants, resorting to the original articles published on their development (initial pharmacological and clinical information) and applied an operational criterion of serendipity developed by our group. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram), selective dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (bupropion), noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine, milnacipram, duloxetine, and desvenlafaxine), selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (reboxetine), noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (mirtazapine), melatonergic agonists (agomelatine), and serotonin modulators and stimulators (vortioxetine, vilazodone, tianeptine) correspond to the type IV pattern. Moclobemide, a reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor, corresponds to the type II pattern, for which the initial serendipitous findings (i.e., the chance discovery of the inhibitory effects of monoamine oxidase (MAO) whilst being studied for their antihyperlipidemic properties) led to subsequent non-serendipitous discoveries (clinical antidepressant efficacy). Ketamine, a glutamatergic modulator, corresponds to the type III pattern, characterized by a non-serendipitous origin (initial development as an anesthetic agent) leading to a serendipitous observation (the discovery of antidepressant efficacy in individuals illicitly using). The majority of new antidepressants adhere to a type IV pattern, characterized by a rational and targeted design process where serendipity played no part, except moclobemide (type II pattern) and ketamine (type III pattern).

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment